ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Application of deep learning in wound size measurement using fingernail as the reference.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing nail disease diagnosis: a capsule network with SE attention and dual backbone models.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Meets Nail Diagnostics: Emerging Image-Based Sensing Platforms for Non-Invasive Disease Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Timeseries-based Multimodal Deep Learning Approach for Lung Nodule Growth Prediction.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMost current wound size measurement devices or applications require manual wound tracing and reference markers. Chronic wound care usually relies on patients or caregivers who might have difficulties using these devices. Considering a more human-centered design, we propose an automatic wound size measurement system by combining three deep learning (DL) models and using fingernails as a reference. MATERIALS AND
methodsDL models (Mask R-CNN, Yolov5, U-net) were trained and tested using photographs of chronic wounds and fingernails. Nail width was obtained through using Mask R-CNN, Yolov5 to crop the wound from the background, and U-net to calculate the wound area. The system's effectiveness and accuracy were evaluated with 248 images, and users' experience analysis was conducted with 30 participants.
resultsIndividual model training achieved a 0.939 Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) for nail-width measurement. Yolov5 had the highest mean average precision (0.822) with an Intersection-over-Union threshold of 0.5. U-net achieved a mean pixel accuracy of 0.9523. The proposed system recognized 100% of fingernails and 97.76% of wounds in the test datasets. PCCs for converting nail width to measured and default widths were 0.875 and 0.759, respectively. Most inexperienced caregivers consider convenience is the most important factor when using a size-measuring tool. Our proposed system yielded 90% satisfaction in the convenience aspect as well as the overall evaluation.
conclusionThe proposed system performs fast and easy-to-use wound size measurement with acceptable precision. Its novelty not only allows for conveniences and easy accessibility in homecare settings and for inexperienced caregivers; but also facilitates clinical treatments and documentation, and supports telemedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.