ArticleBMC medical education2024
Specialists' learning from facilitating group peer telementoring: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explaining the Diffusion of Project ECHO.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGroup peer telementoring supports interprofessional learning through multi-directional and synchronous engagement where experienced and knowledgeable individuals exchange guidance and support with differently experienced and knowledgeable individuals. A leading example of group peer telementoring among medical specialists and medical generalists is Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (Project ECHO), a rapidly spreading program with demonstrated learning outcomes among community-based medical generalists. Yet the multi-directional exchanges that characterize group peer telementoring interactions suggest that specialists facilitating sessions may also learn from the group experiences. We explored what medical specialists learn from community-based medical generalists and from other specialists as a result of facilitating and participating in group peer telementoring.
methodsPairs of ECHO administrative staff and researchers interviewed medical specialists who facilitated Project ECHO work. Using interview transcripts, we identified 129 learning episodes in which 53 specialists discussed what they learned from their Project ECHO experiences. An inductive multi-phase thematic analysis was used to identify what medical specialists were learning and from whom.
resultsThree primary themes emerged from the data. Specialists learned about community-based health care, including learning about unique and novel community-based treatments and patient needs. Specialists broadened and deepened their knowledge of patient care, including taking an interprofessional view and learning more about their own specialty area. Specialists also learned about learning, including revelations about power hierarchies, the importance of opening space for learning, and practicing humility.
conclusionsProject ECHO's emphasis on group peer telementoring brought the realities of community-centric care to the attention of medical specialists, deepening their knowledge about patient care and about learning. Specialists learned from community-based medical generalists, other medical specialists within their discipline, and from medical specialists with other expertise. The "all teach, all learn" space that medical specialists endeavored to create in Project ECHO for community-based medical generalists created a safe space for specialists to admit what they did not know. Continued facilitation and participation in group peer telementoring may provide medical specialists with feedback about diagnoses, treatments, and community-based resources for low-income rural and inner-city patients that contributes to their continued development and medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.