ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Engaging adolescents and young adults in decisions about return of genomic research results: study protocol for a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04481061 (Engaging Adolescents in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Engaging Adolescents in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lessons Learned in Clinical Trial Recruitment: A Partnership Between a Genomic Research Study and the Discover Together Biobank.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2026Review
- Decisional Conflict Among Adolescents and Young Adults Before and After Facilitated Decision-Making About Learning Personal Genomic Information.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026Article
- Participant Choice of Centralized or Remote Trial Engagement: Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Return of results is important to heterogeneous research participants: A single-site survey.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Adolescent and Young Adult Perspectives on Receiving Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Results in a Prospective Genomic Screening Clinical Trial.Public health genomics · 2026Article
- Representation is power: traditional, hybrid, and digital recruitment results from a non-randomized clinical trial engaging adolescents.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Adolescents' and young adults' reactions to and perceived utility of carrier screening results in the context of a genomic research study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Decision stability among adolescents and young adults making choices about learning genomic research results.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo protect minors' future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child's secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. In this manuscript, we report on the methods for a clinical trial that examines adolescents', young adults', and their parents' decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent or young adult.
methodsWe are enrolling assenting (ages 13-17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18-21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining (1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and (2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants' choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and autosomal recessive carrier results. DISCUSSION: This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genomic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04481061. Registered 22 July 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.