Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696322›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Engaging adolescents and young adults in decisions about return of genomic research results: study protocol for a mixed-methods longitudinal clinical trial protocol.

Amy A Blumling, Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows, Kristin Childers-Buschle, Lisa J Martin, John A Lynch, Kevin R Dufendach, Ellen A Lipstein, Melinda Butsch Kovacic, William B Brinkman and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04481061 (Engaging Adolescents in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04481061 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Engaging Adolescents in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiRan2020 to 2026Enrolled787ConditionsGenetic Screening, Adolescent, Genetic Change, Shared Decision MakingArmsElectronic Decision Tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Decisional Conflict Among Adolescents and Young Adults Before and After Facilitated Decision-Making About Learning Personal Genomic Information.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amy A BlumlingCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Michelle L McGowanUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Cynthia A ProwsCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Kristin Childers-BuschleCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Lisa J MartinCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
John A LynchCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Kevin R DufendachHelen DeVos Children's Hospital, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, USA.
Ellen A LipsteinCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Melinda Butsch KovacicCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
William B BrinkmanCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Melanie F MyersCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Melanie.Myers@cchmc.org.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
Engaging adolescents in decisions about return of genomic research resultsR01HG010166 · NHGRI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MCGOWAN, MICHELLE L, MYERS, MELANIE F · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center UL1TR001425NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377NHGRI NIH HHS 1R01HG010166-01A1NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010166University of Cincinnati UL1TR001425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo protect minors' future autonomy, professional organizations have historically discouraged returning predictive adult-onset genetic test results and carrier status to children. Recent clinical guidance diverges from this norm, suggesting that when minors have genomic sequencing performed for clinical purposes, parents and children should have the opportunity to learn secondary findings, including for some adult-onset conditions. While parents can currently opt in or out of receiving their child's secondary findings, the American Society of Human Genetics Workgroup on Pediatric Genetic and Genomic Testing suggests including adolescents in the decision-making process. However, it is not clear what factors young people consider when given the opportunity to learn genetic findings for themselves. In this manuscript, we report on the methods for a clinical trial that examines adolescents', young adults', and their parents' decisions about learning genomic information for the adolescent or young adult.

methodsWe are enrolling assenting (ages 13-17) adolescents and consenting (ages 18-21) young adults in a prospective genomic screening study to assess the choices they make about receiving individual genomic results. Participants use an online tool to indicate whether they want to learn their personal genetic risk for specific preventable, treatable, and adult-onset conditions, as well as carrier status for autosomal recessive conditions. We are examining (1) how choices differ between adolescent and young adult cohorts (as well as between adolescents/young adults and parents) and (2) decisional conflict and stability across study timepoints. Results are returned based on participants' choices. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants explore decisional stability, adolescent/young adult engagement with parents in decision-making, and the impact of learning pathogenic/likely pathogenic and autosomal recessive carrier results. DISCUSSION: This study explores decision making and decision stability between adolescents and parents (where applicable), as well as the ethical implications and impact of return of clinical-grade genetic research results to adolescents and young adults. The results of this study will contribute empirical evidence to support best practices and guidance on engaging young people in genomic research studies and clinical care that offer return of results.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04481061. Registered 22 July 2020.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAdolescentAdultDecision MakingFemaleGenomicsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleYoung AdultAdolescentsClinical trialDecisional conflictDecision makingGenetic testingGenomic screeningGenomic testingParentsReturn of resultsYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID39696322
PMCPMC11657641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.