Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696321›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Third-year medical students' perceptions of confidence and readiness to perform EFAST after training.

Petra Rocic, Ryan Garrison, Kyle Stitle, Austin Reynolds, Rebecca Andrews-Dickert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Petra RocicDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, 925 City Central Ave, Conroe, TX, 77304, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5781-3075
Ryan GarrisonDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, 925 City Central Ave, Conroe, TX, 77304, USA.
Kyle StitleDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, 925 City Central Ave, Conroe, TX, 77304, USA.
Austin ReynoldsDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, 925 City Central Ave, Conroe, TX, 77304, USA.
Rebecca Andrews-DickertDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, 925 City Central Ave, Conroe, TX, 77304, USA. rebecca.andrewsdickert@shsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7550-0729

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) education is increasingly incorporated in undergraduate medical education (UME), evaluation of the effectiveness of various ultrasound-related curricula is a developing field. The Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography (EFAST) is a POCUS exam widely used in emergency medicine. This project examines third-year osteopathic medical (OMS III) students' perceptions of the impact of a focused introduction to EFAST training curriculum on their performance ability and utilization of EFAST during third-year clinical rotations. Furthermore, we assessed student perceptions of barriers to the use of POCUS during third-year clinical rotations.

methodsThe introduction to EFAST curriculum was developed using competency-based backward design and was delivered in July 2022 to incoming OMS III students. The curriculum involved didactics, hands-on ultrasound practice with standardized patients, and a comprehensive OSCE assessment, where students performed the EFAST exam. In July/August 2023, curriculum participants were anonymously surveyed regarding the effectiveness of the EFAST curriculum and perceived barriers to EFAST and POCUS utilization during their third-year clerkships. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed on quantitative and qualitative data.

resultsTwenty-one of 69 (30.4%) participants responded to the survey, with 17 (24.6%) participants completing the entire survey. Respondents reported increased knowledge and confidence in performing and interpreting EFAST, with 82.4% indicating increased likelihood of performing EFAST and POCUS in general. 76.4% performed EFAST at least once during third-year clerkships, with 11.8% performing it 15 times or more. Students reported valuing the safe simulated learning environment of the EFAST training, and identified lack of patients with indications for EFAST, time constraints, lack of ultrasound machine availability and clinician comfort level as barriers to EFAST utilization.

conclusionsThis study presents the implementation of a focused EFAST curriculum developed through competency-based deliberate backward design based on professional guidelines and the anticipated educational needs of our institution and community. Student perceptions provided valuable insight into access and barriers to EFAST and POCUS use in subsequent clinical clerkships, indicating student perception of POCUS curriculum effectiveness may provide insight to continual curriculum improvement.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalEducational MeasurementFemaleFocused Assessment with Sonography for TraumaHumansMaleOsteopathic MedicinePoint-of-Care SystemsUltrasonographyCurriculum designExtended focused assessment with sonography for traumaPoint-of-care ultrasoundUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID39696321
PMCPMC11657367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.