Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696320›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2024

The impact of using simulation-based learning to further develop communication skills of pharmacy students and pharmacists: a systematic review.

Laura Foucault-Fruchard, Vanessa Michelet-Barbotin, Alison Leichnam, Martine Tching-Sin, Pierre Nizet, Sophie Tollec, Fabien Nativel, Elise Vene, Clémentine Fronteau, Jean-François Huon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Laura Foucault-Fruchard *CHU Tours, Service Pharmacie, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France. laura.foucault@univ-tours.fr.
Vanessa Michelet-Barbotin *CHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Alison LeichnamNantes Université, CHU Nantes, 44000, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.
Martine Tching-SinNantes Université, CHU Nantes, 44000, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.
Pierre NizetNantes Université, CHU Nantes, 44000, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.
Sophie TollecCHU Orléans, Orléans, France.
Fabien NativelNantes Université, CHU Nantes, 44000, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.
Elise VeneCHU Rennes, Rennes, France.
Clémentine FronteauNantes Université, CHU Nantes, 44000, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.
Jean-François HuonNantes Université, CHU Nantes, 44000, Pharmacie, Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective communication in healthcare, among professionals and between professionals and patients is crucial for delivering high-quality care. While simulation effectively translates technical skills to clinical practice, its impact on communication, particularly in pharmacies, is less well documented.

aimThis systematic review examined the impact of simulation-based education on communication skills among pharmacy students and pharmacists. It aims to identify the types of simulations used, the outcomes obtained, and the effectiveness of these simulations in enhancing communication skills, perception and confidence.

methodWe conducted searches in MEDLINE, LISSA, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for articles on communication training through simulation for pharmacy students and pharmacists. The search covered the period from inception to August 31, 2022. To be included, studies had to meet the following criteria: (i) target pharmacy student or graduate pharmacists; (ii) use simulation in the field of clinical pharmacy; (iii) provide a complete description of the outcome measure. Studies for which it was impossible to extract data specific to pharmacy students or simulation were excluded. Three investigators independently evaluated each title and abstract. If each investigator considered the citation eligible, six authors progressed to full-text review. The outcomes related to communication were categorized into three groups: perception of the importance of communication in delivering high-quality patient care, confidence in communication skills, and assessed communication proficiency. The quality of studies included in this review was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

resultsThe total number of participants was 3337. Among the 20 articles reviewed, which were primarily published in the United States over the last decade, only one focused on community pharmacists. Quasi experimental designs were predominant, and studies often relied on learners' self-assessments with non-validated questionnaires. Simulation-based learning aimed to enhance communication skills and attitudes across interprofessional contexts (involving nursing and medical students), patients, and families, frequently utilizing simulated patients. Studies evaluating outcomes have emphasized communication skills with patients and families, while those involving healthcare professionals often focused on perception of the importance of communication in delivering high-quality patient care.

conclusionDespite study heterogeneity, this systematic review concluded that simulation-based training significantly enhances perception, confidence, and communication skills. The development of clear guidelines and standardized assessment tools to evaluate communication would significantly improve the validity and reliability of future research efforts (PROSPERO registration: n°CRD42022371915).

Indexed as

CommunicationPharmacistsSimulation TrainingStudents, PharmacyClinical CompetenceEducation, PharmacyHumansClinical pharmacyCommunicationLearningSimulationStudents

Identifiers

PMID39696320
PMCPMC11654339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.