Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696313›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

From technique mastery to scientific thinking: how open-ended experiments shape medical students' perception of laboratory course roles in China.

Qi Lu, Huan Dou, Sunan Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qi LuInstitute of Education, Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China.
Huan DouMedical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China.
Sunan ShenMedical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China. shensn@nju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBasic science education is universally acknowledged as a pivotal component of medical education. In China, medical students undergo significant preclinical training but often lack scientific thinking. As China transitions to a knowledge-intensive nation, addressing this gap is crucial. This research aims to qualitatively and quantitatively examine how sophomore medical students perceive the roles of basic laboratory courses, assess whether open-ended experiments can change these perceptions, and qualitatively determine their feelings towards experienced open-ended experiments.

methodsThis study has an interventional design, surveying students before and after an open-ended experiment to evaluate its impact on their perceptions of the roles of the basic laboratory course. Quantitative methods, including frequency analysis, Kendall's W test, the chi-square test, and an independent t test, were used to analyse the rankings of the roles of basic laboratory courses thoroughly. Moreover, qualitative thematic analysis provides insights into students' experiences with the open-ended experiments.

resultsThe study revealed that the students in the historical control groups considered learning to master experimental operation techniques as the most important role of the laboratory courses, whereas the students in the post-intervention groups regarded cultivating scientific thinking as the most crucial role. Compared with the historical control groups, the post-intervention groups attached greater importance to the role of cultivating scientific thinking, which was statistically significant. The main concerns and experiences of the open-ended experiments discussed by participants from the historical control groups were summarized into two themes: "negatively biased feelings of open-ended experiments" and "inappropriate for open-ended experiments at present". However, the two major themes that emerged from the post-intervention groups are "positively biased feelings of open-ended experiments" and "moderate and appropriate open-ended experiments at present".

conclusionsThis study revealed that medical students' perceptions of the roles of laboratory courses were influenced by experimental teaching methods. Open-ended experiments have emerged as effective tools for fostering scientific thinking. This research emphasizes the importance of refining teaching methods in the preclinical phase to foster an environment conducive for enhancing the scientific thinking of Chinese students and the overall effectiveness of medical education.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalThinkingChinaCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBasic medical educationLaboratory courseOpen-ended experimentsScientific thinkingStudents’ perceptions

Identifiers

PMID39696313
PMCPMC11657453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.