Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696292›Full record

ArticleCancer cell international2024

Integrated lipidomics and RNA-seq reveal prognostic biomarkers in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Xiaopeng Wang, Jingjing Ye, Yan Wu, Hongtao Zhang, Chengpeng Li, Bonan Liu, Xiaoya Guan, Xiuyun Tian, Weiwei Jia, Qiao Liu and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer cell international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Xiaopeng Wang *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Jingjing Ye *Trauma Treatment Center, Peking University People's Hospital; Key Laboratory of Trauma Treatment and Neural Regeneration (Peking University), National Center for Trauma Medicine, Beijing, 100044, P. R. China.
Yan WuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Hongtao ZhangGuowen (Changchun) International Hospital, Changchun, 130000, P. R. China.
Chengpeng LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Bonan LiuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Xiaoya GuanKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Xiuyun TianKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Weiwei JiaKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Qiao LiuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Shuquan LiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Rongze SunKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Daoning LiuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Guoqiang XueKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Zhen WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Liang YanKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Ang LvKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Jianhui WuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China.
Hui QiuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China. qiuhui@bjmu.edu.cn.
Chunyi HaoKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, P. R. China. haochunyi@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospital's Ascent Plan DFL20181104Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Youth Programme QML20181104Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation 7222193China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2020M680260National Natural Science Foundation of China 82000348Science Foundation of Peking University Cancer Hospital 2022-4Science Foundation of Peking University Cancer Hospital XKFZ2421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) is a mesenchymal malignant tumor characterized by different degrees of adipocytic differentiation. Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) are two of the most common subtypes of RLPS, exhibiting clear differences in biological behaviors and clinical prognosis. The metabolic features and genomic characteristics remain unclear.

methodsThis study employed lipidomic and RNA-seq analyses of RLPS tissues from 19 WDLPS and 29 DDLPS patients. Western blot and immunohistochemistry staining were performed to verify the tumor tissue protein levels of TIMP1, FN1, MMP11, GPNMB, and ECM1. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to evaluate different serum protein levels in 128 blood samples from patients with RLPS. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the most crucial variables associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the RLPS patients.

resultsLipidomic analysis revealed a significant difference in lipid metabolism, particularly in phosphatidylcholines and triacylglycerides metabolism. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that 1,630 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were significantly enriched in lipid metabolism, developmental process, and extracellular matrix (ECM) pathways. Integrated lipidomic and transcriptomic analysis identified 29 genes as potential biomarkers between WDLPS and DDLPS. Among the 29 DEGs, we found that TIMP1, FN1, MMP11, GPNMB, and ECM1 were increased in DDLPS tumor tissues than in WDLPS tumor tissues. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed high specificity and sensitivity in diagnosing patients using a five-gene combination (AUC = 0.904). ELISA revealed a significant increase in the serum levels of ECM1 and GPNMB in patients with DDLPS compared to patients with WDLPS. ECM1 increased progressively across different FNCLCC Grades, correlating negatively with RFS (P = 0.043). GPNMB levels showed a negative correlation with OS (P = 0.019).

conclusionsOur study reveals different lipid metabolism, several transcriptional pathways between WDLPS and DDLPS, and examines several serum markers associated with the prognosis of RLPS. These findings provide a vital basis for future endeavors in diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of retroperitoneal liposarcoma with different differentiations.

Indexed as

BiomarkerLipidomicsRetroperitoneal liposarcomaRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39696292
PMCPMC11657886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.