ArticleBMC medical education2024
Behaviors and attitudes towards mobile learning during course work and scientific research among dental, medical and non-medical undergraduates: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Usability and Perceived Usefulness of a Web-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Managing Periapical Radiolucencies in Root-Filled Teeth.Journal of dental education · 2026Article
- Benefits and Challenges of Digital Technologies in Health Professions Education: Insights From Nursing and Medical Radiologic Technology Students in Ethiopia.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMobile learning is a valuable supplement to traditional education methods, but the current research on mobile learning is still insufficient. This study aimed to assess dental undergraduates' behaviors and attitudes towards mobile learning during course work and scientific research and to compare these findings to those of medical and non-medical students.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among undergraduates at Sichuan University, China. Participants completed an online questionnaire covering demographic information, mobile learning behaviors in course work and scientific research, and attitudes towards mobile learning.
resultsA total of 849 valid responses were collected, including 290 dental students, 307 medical students, and 252 non-medical students. The average behavior scores for using mobile devices in course work and scientific research were 3.02 and 3.09 (out of 5), respectively. Smartphones were the most frequently used devices for course work across all majors, while laptops predominated for scientific research. Mobile device preferences for various learning activities were similar across all majors, with minor variations. Over 80% of dental students reported using mobile learning for more than one hour daily for course work, and they had the highest proportion of daily mobile learning exceeding 90 min. Overall, students demonstrated positive attitudes towards mobile learning, with average attitude scores of 3.58, 3.66, and 3.47 (out of 5) for dental, medical, and non-medical students, respectively.
conclusionResult show that dental undergraduates used mobile learning extensively and exhibited positive attitudes towards it for both course work and scientific research. This study highlights mobile device preferences and their alignment with various academic activities, which can inform the strategic development of educational technologies in dental curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.