ArticleBMC health services research2024
Aging in (a meaningful) place - appropriateness and feasibility of Outdoor Reablement in a rural Arctic setting.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs populations age in the Western world, interventions aiming for 'aging in place', such as reablement, have gained prominence. Reablement programs have focused on enabling older people to maintain independence in their home environment. However, while a growing body of research points to the considerable benefits of engaging in outdoor environments, reablement rarely addresses outdoor activities. People living in rural Arctic areas often tend to have strong cultural, social, and emotional attachments to outdoor places, emphasizing the outdoors as a meaningful arena for engagement. Concurrently, rural Arctic communities face unique obstacles in facilitating outdoor activities, such as geographic isolation, limited access to services, harsh climate conditions, and seasonal variations. Recognizing these challenges, our study sought to tailor an outdoor reablement model that is appropriate and feasible for the context of a rural Arctic setting.
methodsThe study design was inspired by a co-design methodology, incorporating data creation through workshops, focus groups, and individual interviews conducted over an eleven-month period. Three municipalities in rural Arctic Norway were involved, with a total of 35 participants, including older people receiving reablement services and healthcare professionals. A socioecological theory supported the thematic data analysis.
resultsThe study yielded experiences that generated a comprehensive model for implementing outdoor reablement that meet the specific needs that the participants experienced in the rural Arctic setting. The model includes the individual level, accounting for physical and mental functioning; the organizational level, necessitating access to aids and equipment and cross-sectorial collaboration; and the environmental level, adapting to climatic, seasonal, and geographic challenges.
conclusionThis study contributes with knowledge that broadens the scope of reablement as an initiative to support aging in place to include outdoor environments. The tailored outdoor reablement model developed in this study addresses the complexity of aging in place in rural Arctic settings. The study underscores the importance of context-specific strategies that support older people in maintaining a healthy and meaningful life through active engagement with the outdoors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.