ArticleBMC medical education2024
The impact of a narrative medicine program on obstetrics and gynecology residents' empathy ability.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A mixed-methods evaluation of a narrative medicine course and its impact on empathy development among medical students.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Impact of sensitisation workshop on empathy levels among postgraduate students: A pre-post interventional study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- From Stories to Science: Mapping Global Trends in Narrative Medicine Research (2004-2024).Cureus · 2025Article
- Determinants of Chinese physicians' engagement in narrative medicine: a comprehensive SEM-ANN analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmpathy is essential in medical practice, particularly in obstetrics and gynecology. Narrative Medicine, which involves storytelling and reflective writing, has been shown to enhance empathy among healthcare providers. Despite its benefits, there is limited research on the impact of narrative medicine on empathy among obstetrics and gynecology residents.
methodsThis study is a prospective controlled trail aimed at investigating the impact of a narrative medicine-based curriculum on the empathy levels of obstetrics and gynecology residents. The subjects of this study are obstetrics and gynecology residents undergoing standardized training at Hangzhou First People's Hospital in 2023, which was divided into two groups: one receiving narrative medicine training and the other, traditional training. The Chinese version of the Jefferson Empathy Scale was used to measure empathy levels before and after the intervention. A self-developed questionnaire was distributed to Group A residents at the end of the narrative medicine course to evaluate the curriculum.
resultsBefore the intervention, there was no significant difference in empathy scores between the two groups. However, after the narrative medicine intervention, Group A showed a significant improvement in empathy scores compared to Group B (P < 0.0001). Residents in Group A also rated the narrative medicine curriculum highly, with 92% considering it "great" or "excellent"; 87% finding it effective in improving empathy and doctor-patient communication; and 91% feeling that this course promoted their self-reflection in medical practice.
conclusionsThe integration of narrative medicine into the training of obstetrics and gynecology residents significantly enhanced their empathy levels. Most residents perceive narrative medicine as a valued and effective means of enhancing doctor-patient communication and reflection capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.