ArticleBMC medical education2024
Exploring perspectives of type 2 diabetes prevention program coaches and training delivery staff on e-learning training: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundE-learning can be an effective and efficient mode of training healthcare practitioners. E-learning training for diabetes prevention program coaches was designed and developed with input from end users. Insight from those who deliver the training and coaches who have taken the training can provide critical feedback for further refinement of the e-learning training. The purpose of this study was to understand diabetes prevention coaches' (i.e., those taking the training) and training delivery staffs' (i.e., those overseeing the training) perspectives of the coach e-learning training. Individuals wishing to become diabetes prevention program coaches were required to complete and pass the e-learning training to become a certified coach.
methodsA pragmatic paradigm guided the methodology for this study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of diabetes prevention program coaches (n = 8) and diabetes prevention program training staff (n = 3). Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using template analysis. Themes were separately constructed from coach and staff data.
resultsThere were seven high order themes constructed from the coach data: (a) training design, (b) "I didn't know what to expect from the training", (c) technology usability, (d) learning, (e) coaches' backgrounds shaped their training experience, (f) support, and (g) coaches valued the training. Two high order themes were constructed from the staff interviews: (a) streamlining the training delivery, and (b) ensuring coaches meet the diabetes prevention program standard.
conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of exploring perspectives of both those receiving and delivering e-learning training to refine content and processes. Qualitatively evaluating the delivery of e-learning training and modifying the training based on the evaluation results can lead to a more acceptable, efficient, and effective e-learning training. Coaches and staff emphasized the benefits of having high-quality online components, and that the brief training promoted gains in knowledge and improvements in skills. Resultswere used to inform modifications to the coach e-learning training for this diabetes prevention program and can be used to inform other healthcare practitioner e-learning trainings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.