ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Integrating genetic and clinical data to predict lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung cancer incidence and risk factors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- [Research Progress on the Regulatory Mechanism of Respiratory Microbiota in the Comorbidity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is closely linked to lung cancer (LC) development. The aim of this study is to identify the genetic and clinical risk factors for LC risk in COPD, according to which the prediction model for LC in COPD was constructed.
methodsThis is a case-control study in which patientis with COPD + LC as the case group, patientis with only COPD as the control group, and patientis with only LC as the second control group. A panel of clinical variables including demographic, environmental and lifestyle factors were collected. A total of 20 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped. The univariate analysis, candidate gene study and multivariate analysis were applied to identify the independent risk factors, as well as the prediction model was constructed. The ROC analysis was used to evaluate the predictive ability of the model.
resultsA total of 503 patients were finally enrolled in this study, with 188 patients for COPD + LC group, 162 patients for COPD group and 153 patients for LC group. The univariate analysis of clincial data showed compared with the patients with COPD, the patients with COPD + LC tended to have significantly lower BMI, higher smoking pack-years, and higher prevalence of emphysema. The results of the candidate gene study showed the rs1489759 in HHIP and rs56113850 in CYP2A6 demonstrated significant differences between COPD and COPD + LC groups. By using multivariate logistic regression analysis, four variables including BMI, pack-years, emphysema and rs56113850 were identified as independent risk factors for LC in COPD and the prediction model integrating genetic and clinical data was constructed. The AUC of the prediction model for LC in COPD reached 0.712, and the AUC of the model for predicting LC in serious COPD reached up to 0.836.
conclusionThe rs56113850 (risk allele C) in CYP2A6, decrease in BMI, increase in pack-years and emphysema presence were independent risk factors for LC in COPD. Integrating genetic and clinical data for predicting LC in COPD demonstrated favorable predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.