ArticleBMC public health2024
Leveraging machine learning models for anemia severity detection among pregnant women following ANC: Ethiopian context.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- High Prevalence and Predictors of Maternal Anemia Risk: Nationwide Midwife-Reported Screening in Indonesia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning approaches to predict maternal anemia and Identifying associated factors among pregnant women in Sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Iron Deficiency Diagnosis in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges, Barriers, and Opportunities.Anemia · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Role of Digital Technology in Preventing Anemia Among Pregnant Women: A Scoping Review.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnemia during pregnancy is a significant public health concern, particularly in resource-limited settings. Machine learning (ML) offers promising avenues for improved anemia detection and management. This study investigates the potential of ML models in predicting anemia severity among pregnant women attending Antenatal Care (ANC) visits in Ethiopia.
methodsData from the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey, specialized hospitals, and public hospitals were utilized. The dataset included individuals diagnosed with severe (65.12%), moderate (15.63%), mild (16.65%) anemia, and non-anemic (2.61%) cases. Feature selection employed filter methods based on mutual information, and F-score was used to assess anemia severity prediction across four classes. Six ML models (MLP-NN, XGBoost, GNB, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and KNN) were evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.
resultsThe Random Forest classifier achieved the best overall performance across all categories, with an accuracy of 97%, precision of 93%, recall of 93%, and F1-score of 93%. This indicates high true positive rates and low false positive rates. While other models like XGBoost, MLP-NN, and Decision Tree showed good performance, they weren't quite as strong as Random Forest. Classifiers like KNN and GNB had lower overall accuracy and a tendency to misclassify some cases.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the promising potential of Random Forest in predicting anemia severity among pregnant women in Ethiopia. The findings contribute to a more holistic understanding of anemia risk factors and pave the way for improved early detection and targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.