ArticleBMC nursing2024
Development and psychometric validation of the comfort scale for injection.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensory comfort: an overlooked dimension in neuropathic pain trials and management.Pain reports · 2026Article
- A Theory-Based Nursing Scale for Measuring the Impact of Sleep Disturbance on Quality of Life.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Comfort-based Pain Management for Intralesional Treatment of Pediatric Post-otoplasty Keloids.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Development and validation of assistance needs assessment scale of the home-dwelling older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Deltoid muscle intramuscular injection methods examining pain comfort satisfaction and fear in ShotBlocker helfer skin tap and standard techniques.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Effect of vibration on pain during subcutaneous heparin injection: A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients' comfort level during the injection procedure affects the quality of care. However, the literature does not provide a valid, reliable, and specific measurement tool to measure this level.
objectiveThe present study aimed to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to determine patients' comfort levels during the injection procedure.
methodThe study was designed methodologically. The study data were collected at two Hospitals. The sample consisted of 102 patients in the pilot application stage and 186 patients in the main application stage. The study's data collection tools were the "Personal Information Form," "VAS for Comfort," and the "Comfort Scale for Injection" draft. The obtained data were used for validity and reliability analyses. Validity analyses involved content validity, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and criterion validity. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha and split-half tests. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 22 and AMOS. EFA used the KMO test and Bartlett's Test (KMO = 0.878; p < 0.001), with Varimax rotation, while CFA confirmed the factor structure. Pearson correlation evaluated criterion validity.
resultsThe scale consisted of 10 items and two sub-scales: "Comfort during the Injection Procedure" and "Environmental Comfort." The "VAS for Comfort" and the scale and its sub-scales showed a positive correlation. The Cronbach Alpha Value of the entire scale was found to be 0.899.
conclusionThe data showed that the "Comfort Scale for Injection" is an adequate, valid, and reliable measurement tool for determining patients' comfort level during the injection procedure. Measuring patients' comfort levels during injection at regular intervals is recommended, as new studies are planned to increase injection comfort and adapt the "Comfort Scale for Injection" for different languages and cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.