Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696195›Full record

ReviewBMC medical education2024

Enhancing the effectiveness of interprofessional education in health science education: a state-of-the-art review.

Janique Oudbier, Etienne Verheijck, Denise van Diermen, Jan Tams, Jos Bramer, Gerard Spaai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janique OudbierAcademic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Etienne VerheijckAcademic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. e.e.verheijck@acta.nl.
Denise van DiermenAcademic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jan TamsAcademic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jos BramerAmsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Gerard SpaaiAcademic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to foster effective collaboration and improve healthcare outcomes, students from multiple health professions engage in interprofessional education (IPE), learning together and from each other. Existing literature explores the effectiveness of IPE within health sciences but presents varied findings. The purpose of this study is to The effectiveness of IPE is defined as the four levels of training evaluation delineated by Kirkpatrick: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. Affecting factors are defined as elements directly influencing IPE effectiveness, while intermediating factors are influenced by these affecting factors, subsequently impacting overall IPE effectiveness.

methodsA state-of-the-art review was conducted using medical databases PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus. Search terms included: (interprofessional learning) OR (interprofessional education) AND (higher education) within the time frame of 2017 to 2022. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists for quasi-experimental and qualitative studies. Study features were evaluated using a coding scheme, and qualitative analysis of the included studies was performed.

resultsFifty-four studies met the inclusion criteria after screening. Qualitative analysis revealed four affecting factors: 1) Community-based learning approach, 2) Problem-based learning approach, 3) Experiential learning approach, and 4) Technology-based learning approach. Intermediating factors included student and team characteristics, such as boundary crossing, team leadership, readiness, educational discipline and background, and interprofessional attitudes. Additionally, educational design characteristics, like intervention duration, facilitation, and authenticity of learning experiences, served as intermediating factors. Organizational characteristics, such as organizational culture and logistics, were identified as further intermediating factors.

conclusionThis study provides insight on factors affecting and intermediating IPE effectiveness, vital in the design of IPE programs. Based on the findings we formulated six practical tips to enhance IPE effectiveness.

Indexed as

Health OccupationsInterprofessional EducationCooperative BehaviorCurriculumHumansInterprofessional RelationsAffecting and intermediating factorsEffectivenessHealth science educationInterprofessional education

Identifiers

PMID39696195
PMCPMC11657493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.