Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696194›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Key informant perspectives of suicide prevention in Australia.

Bridget Bassilios, David Dunt, Karolina Krysinska, Anna Machlin, Danielle Newton, Dianne Currier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bridget BassiliosCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. b.bassilios@unimelb.edu.au.
David DuntCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Karolina KrysinskaCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Anna MachlinCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Danielle NewtonCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Dianne CurrierCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide prevention policy in Australia is in a period of reform. The National Suicide Prevention Office is leading the development of a new National Suicide Prevention Strategy (Strategy). Stakeholder input is a critical element in the development of the new Strategy. This article describes key informant views about government-led suicide prevention efforts in Australia obtained as part of an environmental scan conducted as one input to inform the Strategy development process.

methodsWe interviewed 24 key informants in November and December 2022. Key informants were purposively recruited to ensure representation from cross-jurisdiction government departments/agencies, peak bodies and leaders in the suicide prevention sector, people with lived experience of suicide, and suicide prevention researchers. We enquired about successes, challenges, and opportunities. NVivo was used to conduct thematic analysis.

resultsKey themes identified as successes in Australia's suicide prevention efforts included: leadership and funding for programs, services, and research; valuing the collective lived experience voice; moving towards a whole-of-government/system approach; and high community and political suicide (prevention) awareness. Key themes emerging as challenges in the sector were: defining the suicide prevention sector, limitations in the service system, workforce issues, and building the evidence base. Key themes mentioned as opportunities for improving suicide prevention efforts were: leveraging the current unprecedented awareness and desire for collaboration among multiple stakeholder groups; adopting wellness rather than crisis-driven models of care; including lived experience and co-design in all stages and aspects of policy planning, service development, and evaluation; and investing in data, research, and evaluation.

conclusionsKey informants from across the suicide prevention sector in Australia identified a range of issues for consideration in the development of Australia's new National Suicide Prevention Strategy which are also relevant for suicide prevention policy and program development in other high-income countries. Key issues include the need for concerted efforts to define and build the capacity of the suicide prevention sector, implement and monitor a whole-of-government approach that includes wellness models of care and lived experience, and bolster the evidence base. These efforts require effective leadership and resourcing.

Indexed as

Suicide PreventionAustraliaHealth PolicyHumansInterviews as TopicLeadershipQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationNational suicide prevention strategyStakeholder perspectivesSuicide preventionSuicide prevention policy

Identifiers

PMID39696194
PMCPMC11654301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.