Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39696169›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Lifestyles of university students: analyzing the role of social support and family dynamics.

Henrique da-Silva-Domingues, Pedro Ángel Palomino-Moral, Belén Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Sara Moreno-Cámara, Helena Maria Almeida Macedo Loureiro, Rafael Del-Pino-Casado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Problematic Smartphone Use and Quality of Life Among Greek Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Henrique da-Silva-DominguesDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, 23071, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7860-5622
Pedro Ángel Palomino-MoralDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, 23071, Spain. pamoral@ujaen.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8932-2852
Belén Gutiérrez-SánchezDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, 23071, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3275-7062
Sara Moreno-CámaraDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, 23071, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-6035
Helena Maria Almeida Macedo LoureiroUniversity of Aveiro School of Health (ESSUA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-5923
Rafael Del-Pino-CasadoDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, 23071, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2263-2415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYouth is a critical stage for developing healthy lifestyles, as the habits and behaviors formed during this period can persist into adulthood. Understanding the relationship between family factors and the lifestyles of university students can contribute to creating strategies to improve this important health determinant. This research aimed to analyze the relationship between social support, family dynamics, and lifestyles in young university students.

designA cross-sectional descriptive study.

methodsA probability sample of 530 young university students was analyzed. The main measurements included social support, family dynamics, and lifestyles. Descriptive analysis of quantitative and qualitative variables was performed. Pearson correlation coefficient was used for bivariate analysis, and Student's t-test was used to analyze differences between male and female participants. Additionally, multivariate analysis was conducted using multiple linear regression.

resultsFor the total sample, a positive and moderate association was found between family dynamics (r = 0.28) and social support (r = 0.32) with the lifestyles of young individuals.

conclusionsOur results indicated that social support and family dynamics are possible protective factors that have a positive effect on the lifestyles of university students. The findings of this study highlight the importance of family and familial support in adopting healthy lifestyles among university students.

Indexed as

Family RelationsLife StyleSocial SupportStudentsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultFamily dynamicsHealthy lifestyleSocial supportStudent healthYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID39696169
PMCPMC11653689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.