ArticleBMC medical education2024
Computer case-based reasoning simulation versus traditional lectures for medical interns teaching of diagnosis and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infection: a comparative quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer-based case simulations enhances clinical reasoning skills of non-dental medical students as measured by mini-CEX.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Construction of research feedback experimental teaching mode for medical undergraduate students and comparative study with traditional experimental teaching mode.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory infections are a common presentation in clinical practice and medical interns must learn proper diagnosis and antibiotic prescribing. Traditional lecture-based teaching may not provide sufficient opportunities for students to apply their knowledge in realistic scenarios, whereas computer case-based simulations offer an alternative approach that allows active learning and decision-making in simulated patient cases. This study investigated the effectiveness of computer case-based reasoning simulation versus traditional lectures for medical interns teaching of diagnosis and antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections.
methodsThis comparative quasi-experimental study was conducted from 2020 to 2022 in the Department of Infectious Diseases at Shahid Beheshti Hospital, affiliated to Kashan University of Medical Sciences. The samples were selected using a convenience method and assigned to the intervention and control groups using a permuted block randomization approach. Over a period of ten months (Each month, an average of eight medical interns), a total of 40 medical interns received traditional lecture-based teaching, while another 40 medical interns were taught using a Computer Case-based Reasoning simulation. The medical interns' knowledge in both groups was assessed using pre- and post-tests. The collected data from the pre- and post-tests were then analyzed statistically using paired t-tests, independent t-tests, and ANCOVA.
resultsThe posttest scores of the medical interns in both groups were significantly higher than the pretest scores (P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two teaching methods regarding mean knowledge gains in diagnoses and antibiotic prescribing practices. (P > 0.21). The results of the ANCOVA, after controlling for pre-test scores, showed no statistically significant difference between the two teaching methods in their effect on medical interns' diagnostic and antibiotic prescribing performance (P > 0.33).
conclusionThe study found that both computer case-based reasoning simulation and traditional lectures were effective in improving medical interns' knowledge of diagnosis and antibiotic prescribing practices for acute respiratory infections. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two teaching methods. Thus, computer- based simulation could replace face-to-face teaching when this method is impractical or computerized methods are more cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.