Trial reportBMC cancer2024
Effects of long-acting versus short-acting granulocyte colony stimulating factor after radiotherapy in gynecologic malignancies: a prospective observational cohort study.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03793205 (Long-acting Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor for the Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia in Gynecologic Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Long-acting Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor for the Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia in Gynecologic Cancer Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Little is known about the role of the protective effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients after radiotherapy. The aim of the present study was to explore the prophylactic effects of long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on febrile neutropenia (FN) and myelosuppression in chemotherapy patients with gynecologic malignancies after pelvic radiotherapy. Patients voluntarily participated in a study group (long-acting G-CSF for all chemotherapy cycles) and a control group (short-acting G-CSF) after they were educated about G-CSF utilization. The incidences of FN and myelosuppression, as well as adverse events, were compared between the two groups. A regression model was used to determine the risk factors for FN and myelosuppression. From January 6, 2019, to August 22, 2019, 61 patients were included in the final analysis, with 286 chemotherapy cycles. There were 14 (23.0%) and 57 (77.0%) patients in the study and control groups, respectively. The study group had significantly fewer complete blood count tests, fewer outpatient clinic visits, fewer short-acting G-CSF doses, and lower incidences of FN and myelosuppression per chemotherapy cycle. According to the binary regression model, the use of long-acting G-CSF was the only factor associated with a decreased incidence of myelosuppression but not FN. The major adverse event related to G-CSF was mild bone pain. In conclusion, long-acting G-CSF may effectively reduce the incidence of FN and myelosuppression with mild adverse effects during chemotherapy after radiotherapy.Trial registrationRegistered at https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ on January 4, 2019 (NCT03793205).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.