ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Evaluating causal associations of chronotype with pregnancy and perinatal outcomes and its interactions with insomnia and sleep duration: a mendelian randomization study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObservational studies suggested chronotype was associated with pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Whether these associations are causal is unclear. Our aims are to use Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore (1) associations of evening preference with stillbirth, miscarriage, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, perinatal depression, preterm birth and offspring birthweight; and (2) differences in associations of insomnia and sleep duration with those outcomes between chronotype preferences.
methodsWe conducted two-sample MR using 105 genetic variants reported in a genome-wide association study (N = 248,100) to instrument for lifelong predisposition to evening- versus morning-preference. We generated variant-outcome associations in European ancestry women from UK Biobank (UKB, N = 176,897), Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC, N = 6826), Born in Bradford (BiB, N = 2940) and the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa, N = 57,430), and extracted equivalent associations from FinnGen (N = 190,879). We used inverse variance weighted (IVW) as main analysis, with weighted median and MR-Egger as sensitivity analyses. Relying on the individual participant data from UKB, ALSPAC, BiB and MoBa, we also conducted IVW analyses of insomnia and sleep duration on the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes, stratified by genetically predicted chronotypes.
resultsIn IVW and sensitivity analyses, we did not find robust evidence of associations of chronotype with the outcomes. Insomnia was associated with a higher risk of preterm birth among evening preference women (odds ratio 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.17, 2.21), but not among morning preference women (odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.64, 1.18), with an interaction P-value = 0.01. There was no evidence of interactions between insomnia and chronotype on other outcomes, or between sleep duration and chronotype on any outcomes.
conclusionsThis study raises the possibility of a higher risk of preterm birth among women with insomnia who also have an evening preference. Our findings warrant replications due to imprecise estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.