ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
Leopard spot retinopathy represents the initial sign of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in children: a report of two cases.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeopard spots can appear in a variety of diseases; however, they are extremely rare in children with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. This study presents two such rare cases in which leopard spot retinopathy was the initial manifestation of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1 involved a 4-year-old boy had previously been diagnosed with left eye uveitis and received systemic steroid therapy at a local hospital, but symptoms persisted. Extensive leopard-spot changes were observed in the posterior pole of the left eye and optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed multifocal, shallow retinal detachment in the left eye. Case 2 involved a 16-year-old girl who visited for decreased vision in her right eye. Examination of the right eye revealed leopard-spot changes at the posterior pole and a retinal hole in the fundus; multifocal retinal detachment was noted on OCT. In both cases, subretinal fluid was significantly absorbed after retinal laser photocoagulation or scleral buckling, with no recurrence of retinal detachment at late follow-up.
conclusionsWhen leopard-spot changes are observed, the fundus must be carefully examined for any potential retinal holes, especially in pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.