SynthesisBMC cancer2024
Efficacy of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in resectable NSCLC: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a PD-L1 and tumor mutational burden-based predictive model for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable lung cancer.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Predictive value of Ki-67 expression in predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in lung squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy of additional PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the neoadjuvant treatment of resctable NSCLC.
methodsData sources included Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed from beginning of the database creation to May 2024. The primary outcomes of the study included event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), pathological complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR).
resultsSeven RCTs, including 2929 patients, were included in the analysis. The results showed that the experimental group had significantly higher rates of pCR (RR = 5.9, p < 0.001) and MPR (RR = 2.88, p < 0.001) compared to the control group. OS (HR = 0.57) and EFS (HR = 0.58) was also significantly improved in the experimental group. Subgroup analysis of EFS revealed that the benefit was higher in the East (HR = 0.56) than in the West (HR = 0.70). Additionally, the benefit seemed to rise with PD-L1 tumor cell proportion score (TPS) (TPS < 1%, HR = 0.76; 1% < TPS < 49%, HR = 0.56; TPS ≥ 50%, HR = 0.38). The benefit degree seemed to be higher in the III period patients (HR = 0.75) than I-II period patients (HR = 0.52). It is important to emphasize that smokers (HR = 0.54, p < 0.001) benefited from neoadjuvant immunotherapy but nonsmokers (HR = 0.68, p = 0.055) did not.
conclusionNeoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy can significantly improve the short-term and long-term prognosis of patients with resectable NSCLC. Moreover, the efficacy of this treatment regimen may be affected by different clinicopathological characteristics of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.