Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695971›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024

Unravelling intubation challenges: a machine learning approach incorporating multiple predictive parameters.

Parisa Sezari, Zeinab Kohzadi, Ali Dabbagh, Alireza Jafari, Saba Khoshtinatan, Kamran Mottaghi, Zahra Kohzadi, Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Parisa SezariDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zeinab KohzadiDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 1th floor, No 21, Darband St., Tajrish sq., Tehran, Iran. z.kohzadi96@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8038-5454
Ali DabbaghDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza JafariDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saba KhoshtinatanDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kamran MottaghiDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra KohzadiIlam County Health Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.
Shahabedin RahmatizadehDepartment of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 1th floor, No 21, Darband St., Tajrish sq., Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2429-1642

Funding

Anesthesiology Research Center 43009234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo protect patients during anesthesia, difficult airway management is a serious issue that needs to be carefully planned for and carried out. Machine learning prediction tools have recently become increasingly common in medicine, frequently surpassing more established techniques. This study aims to utilize machine learning techniques on predictive parameters for challenging airway management.

methodsThis study was cross-sectional. The Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Iran's Loghman Hakim and Shahid Labbafinezhad hospitals provided 622 records in total for analysis. Using the forest of trees approach and feature importance, important features were chosen. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and repeated edited nearest neighbor under-sampling were used to balance the data. Using Python and 10-fold cross-validation, seven machine learning algorithms were assessed: Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (INFORMATION-GAIN and GINI-INDEX), Decision Tree, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Metrics like F-measure, AUC, Recall, Accuracy, Specificity, and Precision were used to evaluate the performance of the model.

resultsTwenty-four important features were chosen from the original 32 features. The under-sampling strategy produced better results than SMOTE. Among the algorithms, KNN (Euclidean, Minkowski) had better performance than other algorithms. The highest values ​​for accuracy, precision, recall, F-measure, and AUC were obtained at 0.87, 0.88, 0.82, 0.85, and 0.87, respectively.

conclusionAlgorithms for machine learning provide insightful information for anticipating challenging airway management. By making it possible to forecast airway difficulties more accurately, these techniques can potentially improve clinical practice and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealMachine LearningAdultAirway ManagementAlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesDecision TreesFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedSupport Vector MachineAirway managementAnesthesiaArtificial intelligenceDifficult airwayIntratracheal intubationMachine learning algorithms

Identifiers

PMID39695971
PMCPMC11654375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.