ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024
Unravelling intubation challenges: a machine learning approach incorporating multiple predictive parameters.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting difficult laryngoscopy via three-dimensional graphical modeling and hybrid artificial intelligence using standard facial photographs in elective surgery patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- AI-based decision models for difficult airway assessment: from research innovation to clinical implementation-a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo protect patients during anesthesia, difficult airway management is a serious issue that needs to be carefully planned for and carried out. Machine learning prediction tools have recently become increasingly common in medicine, frequently surpassing more established techniques. This study aims to utilize machine learning techniques on predictive parameters for challenging airway management.
methodsThis study was cross-sectional. The Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Iran's Loghman Hakim and Shahid Labbafinezhad hospitals provided 622 records in total for analysis. Using the forest of trees approach and feature importance, important features were chosen. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and repeated edited nearest neighbor under-sampling were used to balance the data. Using Python and 10-fold cross-validation, seven machine learning algorithms were assessed: Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (INFORMATION-GAIN and GINI-INDEX), Decision Tree, and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Metrics like F-measure, AUC, Recall, Accuracy, Specificity, and Precision were used to evaluate the performance of the model.
resultsTwenty-four important features were chosen from the original 32 features. The under-sampling strategy produced better results than SMOTE. Among the algorithms, KNN (Euclidean, Minkowski) had better performance than other algorithms. The highest values for accuracy, precision, recall, F-measure, and AUC were obtained at 0.87, 0.88, 0.82, 0.85, and 0.87, respectively.
conclusionAlgorithms for machine learning provide insightful information for anticipating challenging airway management. By making it possible to forecast airway difficulties more accurately, these techniques can potentially improve clinical practice and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.