ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
NERVE 2.0: boosting the new enhanced reverse vaccinology environment via artificial intelligence and a user-friendly web interface.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in vaccine development: applications, implementation, and future directions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- B-vac a robust software package for bacterial vaccine design.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVaccines development in this millennium started by the milestone work on Neisseria meningitidis B, reporting the invention of Reverse Vaccinology (RV), which allows to identify vaccine candidates (VCs) by screening bacterial pathogens genome or proteome through computational analyses. When NERVE (New Enhanced RV Environment), the first RV software integrating tools to perform the selection of VCs, was released, it prompted further development in the field. However, the problem-solving potential of most, if not all, RV programs is still largely unexploited by experimental vaccinologists that impaired by somehow difficult interfaces, requiring bioinformatic skills.
resultsWe report here on the development and release of NERVE 2.0 (available at: https://nerve-bio.org ) which keeps the original integrative and modular approach of NERVE, while showing higher predictive performance than its previous version and other web-RV programs (Vaxign and Vaxijen). We renewed some of its modules and added innovative ones, such as Loop-Razor, to recover fragments of promising vaccine candidates or Epitope Prediction for the epitope prediction binding affinities and population coverage. Along with two newly built AI (Artificial Intelligence)-based models: ESPAAN and Virulent. To improve user-friendliness, NERVE was shifted to a tutored, web-based interface, with a noSQL-database to consent the user to submit, obtain and retrieve analysis results at any moment.
conclusionsWith its redesigned and updated environment, NERVE 2.0 allows customisable and refinable bacterial protein vaccine analyses to all different kinds of users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.