Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695929›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2024

Deciphering genetic characteristics of South China and North China indigenous pigs through selection signatures.

Yahui Gao, Xueyan Feng, Shuqi Diao, Yuqiang Liu, Zhanming Zhong, Xiaotian Cai, Guangzhen Li, Jinyan Teng, Xiaohong Liu, Jiaqi Li and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Local Climate Adaptation in Chinese Indigenous Pig Genomes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Single nucleotide variations in theFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yahui Gao *State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Xueyan Feng *State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Shuqi DiaoState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Yuqiang LiuState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Zhanming ZhongState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Xiaotian CaiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Guangzhen LiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Jinyan TengState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Xiaohong LiuState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China.
Jiaqi LiState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China.
Zhe ZhangState Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China. zhezhang@scau.edu.cn.

Funding

China Agriculture Research System CARS-35Guangdong Province Rural Revitalization Strategy Special Fund Seed Industry Revitalization Project 2022-440000-43010101-9501Guangxi Science and Technology Program Project GuikeJB23023003Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project 2024A04J3806Specific university discipline construction project 2023B10564001the National Key R & D Program of China 2023YFD1300400Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32402714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndigenous pig breeds in China have accumulated significant genetic diversity due to regional selection pressures. Investigating the selection signatures of these populations helps to understand their adaptive evolution and contributes to genetic improvement programs.

resultsWe collected whole-genome sequencing data from 133 individuals, including South China and North China indigenous pigs and Asian wild boars. After data filtering, we retained 31,521,978 high-quality SNPs. Population structure analysis using PCA revealed distinct genetic clustering among these populations. Selection signature detection identified 5,227 loci under selection in South China indigenous pigs and 5,800 in North China indigenous pigs compared to Asian wild boars. Candidate genes were enriched in immune response pathways, reproductive traits, and pigmentation pathways. South China indigenous pigs exhibited selection signals for fat deposition and immune responses, while North China indigenous pigs showed stronger signals related to growth, blood physiology, and reproductive performance. Additionally, key genes such as MC1R and KIT were associated with coat color variation, and IGF1R and IGF2R were linked to growth regulation.

conclusionOur results demonstrate that indigenous pigs in China have undergone selection for distinct traits aligned with their regional environments and farming systems. South China indigenous pigs have been selected for traits related to fat deposition and immunity, while North China indigenous pigs have been selected for growth and reproductive traits. The findings offer crucial insights into the genetic architecture of indigenous pig breeds, providing a valuable foundation for future genetic breeding programs.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticAnimalsBreedingChinaGenetics, PopulationPhenotypeSus scrofaSwineWhole Genome SequencingChina indigenous pigsSelection signaturesWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39695929
PMCPMC11653809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.