ArticleBMC microbiology2024
Bacterial contamination of new dental unit waterlines and efficacy of shock disinfection.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing hydrogen peroxide shock treatment frequencies for dental unit waterlines contamination control: a pilot study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Implementation and Preliminary Evaluation of a Low-Cost Sodium Hypochlorite Shock Disinfection Protocol for Dental Unit Waterlines.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Dental devices and antimicrobial resistance: challenges, innovations, and regulatory compliances.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
- Review
- Periodic detection and disinfection maintenance of dental unit waterlines in dental simulation head model laboratories.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacterial contamination of outlet water from dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) may lead to healthcare-associated infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contamination of DUWLs from new dental chairs before and after their initial shock disinfection with ICX Renew® and to determine the efficacy of this method of shock disinfection.
methodsThe microbiological quality of water samples obtained from the DUWLs of 17 new dental chairs installed at the University Hospital of Nancy, France, was assessed. Water samples were collected before and after an initial shock disinfection with one ICX Renew® treatment. Water analysis was used to assess total culturable aerobic bacteria (TCAB) at 22°C and 36°C, Legionella sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and total coliforms.
resultsAll the DUWLs (17/17) were contaminated by viable aerobic bacteria (TCAB at 22°C and 36°C > 300 CFU/mL), including P. aeruginosa, before shock disinfection. After shock disinfection with ICX Renew®, 24% of DUWLs (4/17) remained contaminated by aerobic bacteria (TCAB at 36°C > 300 CFU/mL for 3/17) and P. aeruginosa (> 100 CFU/100 mL for 1/17).
conclusionsTo reduce the contamination of new dental chairs, initial shock disinfection of DUWLs should be performed to remove biofilms and bacteria from the DUWLs. To ensure the security of care, microbiological analysis of outlet water from DUWLs should be systematically performed before the first clinical use of a new dental chair to determine the efficacy of shock disinfection and the agreement of the results with the dental recommendations for water quality. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.