Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695870›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2024

Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block versus serratus anterior plane block in breast surgery-a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Samiullah Shaikh, Umm E Salma Shabbar Banatwala, Paranshi Desai, Muhammad Arham Khan, Rimsha Bint-E-Hina, Sidra Samad, Muhammad Hamza Sikandari, Ali Nawaz, Rana Ijaz, Shayan Asmat and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Samiullah ShaikhLiaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan. sami.shaikh581@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8237-9080
Umm E Salma Shabbar BanatwalaDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2915-0634
Paranshi DesaiBukovinian State Medical University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9936-7667
Muhammad Arham KhanDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2278-1596
Rimsha Bint-E-HinaDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9236-5784
Sidra SamadLiaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan.
Muhammad Hamza SikandariShaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ali NawazAllama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6860-3457
Rana IjazServices Institute of Medical Sciences(SIMS), Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6413-7227
Shayan AsmatAllama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abeer FatimaJinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1248-9921
Harim MirzaDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Noor Mahal AzamRawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2332-0343
Qurat Ul Ain MuhammadRawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1771-2149
Satesh KumarShaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College Lyari, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mahima KhatriDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMastectomy and breast-conserving surgery are key interventions for breast cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Many undergoing breast surgery experience postoperative pain compromising their functionality and quality of life. While multiple pain management strategies are available, evidence comparing the erector spinae (ESPB) and serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB) for improving post-surgical pain management in breast cancer surgery patients is limited. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy and safety of these two regional anesthesia techniques.

methodsAfter PROSPERO registration, we systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library until May 2024. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and standard mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) were computed for continuous data. RevMan Review Manager 5.4.1 was used for the data analysis and generation of forest plots as well as funnel plots. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 (18) and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were used to appraise and evaluate the evidence (19).

resultsA total of 9 randomized control trials enrolling 550 patients were included. Static pain scores at 0, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery, dynamic pain scores computed at 0, 8, 12, and 24 h after surgery and area under the curve (AUC) static pain score at all time points between 0 and 24 h (SMD (HKSJ 95% CI) - 0.27 [- 0.99, 0.45]) did not significantly vary with either plane block. Postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 h and the number of patients requesting analgesia were significantly greater in those receiving SAPB [MD: - 1.41 (95% C.I. - 2.70, - 0.13), p = 0.03] and [RR: 1.28 (95% C.I. 1.00, 1.63), p = 0.05], respectively. The time to first postoperative analgesic use was significantly greater among those administered ESPB [MD: 1.55 h, (95% C.I. 1.02, 2.09), p < 0.01]. Patient satisfaction scores and the incidence of nausea and vomiting were similar across both groups.

conclusionsWhile pain scores with either block are comparable, ESPB reduces postoperative morphine consumption and may be the favorable option in breast cancer patients undergoing surgery.

Indexed as

Breast cancer surgeryESPBPostoperative painRegional anesthesiaSAPB

Identifiers

PMID39695870
PMCPMC11657579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.