ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2024
Shear stress controls prokaryotic and eukaryotic biofilm communities together with EPS and metabolomic expression in a semi-controlled coastal environment in the NW Mediterranean Sea.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns of Functional Redundancy and Anaerobic Metabolic Potential Characterise the Skin Microbiome of a Critically Endangered Sawfish.Environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Microbial autotrophy driven by extracellular electrons generated from mechanical forces via flexoelectricity.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Multiscale insights into biofilm development on hydrophobic fouling-release coatings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Long-term heating differently impacts diversity and seasonal dynamics of prokaryotes and micro-eukaryotes in Baltic Sea coastal biofilm communities.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Integrating Plant Physiology and Microbiome Engineering for Climate-Resilient Crops: Bridging Knowledge Gaps in Multi-Stress Tolerance.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While waves, swells and currents are important drivers of the ocean, their specific influence on the biocolonization of marine surfaces has been little studied. The aim of this study was to determine how hydrodynamics influence the dynamics of microbial communities, metabolic production, macrofoulers and the associated vagile fauna. Using a field device simulating a shear stress gradient, a multi-scale characterization of attached communities (metabarcoding, LC-MS, biochemical tests, microscopy) was carried out for one month each season in Toulon Bay (northwestern Mediterranean). Shear stress appeared to be the primary factor influencing biomass, EPS production and community structure and composition. Especially, the transition from static to dynamic conditions, characterized by varying shear stress intensities, had a more pronounced effect on prokaryotic and eukaryotic beta-diversity than changes in shear stress intensity or seasonal physico-chemical parameters. In static samples, mobile microbe feeders such as arthropods and nematodes were predominant, whereas shear stress favored the colonization of sessile organisms and heterotrophic protists using the protective structure of biofilms for growth. The increase in shear stress resulted in a decrease in biomass but an overproduction of EPS, specifically exopolysaccharides, suggesting an adaptive response to withstand shear forces. Metabolite analysis highlighted the influence of shear stress on community dynamics. Specific metabolites associated with static conditions correlated positively with certain bacterial and algal groups, indirectly indicating reduced grazer control with increasing shear stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.