Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695812›Full record

ReviewBiological research2024

Are we cultivating the perfect storm for a human avian influenza pandemic?

Tomas Perez-Acle, Cesar Ravello, Mario Rosemblatt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Science for Pandemic Preparedness: A Precautionary Framework.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. The emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 in dairy cattle: implications for public health, animal health, and pandemic preparedness.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 in Cats (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomas Perez-AcleComputational Biology Laboratory, Fundacion Ciencia & Vida, Universidad San Sebastian, Avda. del Valle Norte 725, Huechuraba, 8580702, Santiago, Region Metropolitana, Chile. tomas.perez-acle@uss.cl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3769-390X
Cesar RavelloComputational Biology Laboratory, Fundacion Ciencia & Vida, Universidad San Sebastian, Avda. del Valle Norte 725, Huechuraba, 8580702, Santiago, Region Metropolitana, Chile.
Mario RosemblattLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Inmunology, Fundacion Ciencia & Vida, Universidad San Sebastian, Avda. del Valle Norte 725, Huechuraba, 8580702, Santiago, Region Metropolitana, Chile.

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Centro BASAL Ciencia & Vida FB210008Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation CDC-RFA-FT-23-0069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A H5N1 virus in dairy cattle marks a troubling new chapter in the ongoing battle against zoonotic diseases. Since its initial detection in 1955, the H5N1 virus has primarily been associated with poultry, posing significant threats to both animal and human health. However, recent outbreaks in U.S. dairy herds across nine states have revealed an alarming expansion of the virus, with over 190 herds affected as of September 2024. This unprecedented spread in cattle has sparked intense concern among scientists and health officials, especially with reports indicating that up to 20% of dairy products may contain traces of the virus. The implications of the H5N1 virus establishing itself in cattle populations are profound. This potential endemic presence could transform dairy farms into reservoirs of the virus, facilitating its evolution and increasing the risk of human transmission. Mutations enhancing viral replication in mammals have already been identified, including the notorious PB2 E627K mutation linked to increased virulence. Moreover, the detection of the virus in the central nervous system of infected animals, including cats, underscores the broad tissue tropism and severe pathogenic potential of the H5N1 virus. Current containment efforts include stringent biosecurity measures and financial incentives for enhanced testing and personal protective equipment (PPE) for farmers. Yet, gaps in testing infrastructure and the resurgence of raw milk consumption pose significant challenges. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) emphasize the critical need for comprehensive testing and pasteurization to mitigate the risk of human infection. As the scientific community races to adapt existing antiviral treatments and develop effective vaccines, the concept of a One Health approach becomes increasingly vital. This holistic strategy calls for coordinated actions across human, animal, and environmental health sectors to preemptively tackle emerging zoonotic threats. Strengthening surveillance, fostering international cooperation, and investing in research are essential steps to prevent the H5N1 virus from igniting the next global health crisis. The current avian influenza outbreak serves as a stark reminder of the delicate balance between human activities and viral evolution. Our collective ability to respond effectively and proactively will determine whether we can avert the perfect storm brewing on the horizon.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanPandemicsAnimalsCattleHumansInfluenza in BirdsUnited StatesZoonosesDairy cattleH5N1HPAIPandemic

Identifiers

PMID39695812
PMCPMC11658083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.