Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695790›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2024

Are crystalloid-based fluid expansion strategies still relevant in the first hours of trauma induced hemorrhagic shock?

Perrine Tubert, Alexandre Kalimouttou, Pierre Bouzat, Jean-Stéphane David, Tobias Gauss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bimodal distribution of trauma-related acute kidney injury (TrAKI): A clinical review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Perrine Tubert *Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France. perrinetubert@gmail.com.
Alexandre Kalimouttou *Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Pierre BouzatDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Jean-Stéphane DavidDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Lyon Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Tobias GaussDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrystalloid-based fluid resuscitation has long been a cornerstone in the initial management of trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock. However, its benefit is increasingly questioned as it is suspected to increase bleeding and worsen coagulopathy. The emergence of alternative strategies like permissive hypotension and vasopressor use lead to a shift in early trauma care practices. Critical appraisal of current evidence is necessary to guide clinicians and outline research perspectives. MAIN TEXT: Current guidelines for managing trauma-induced hemorrhagic shock suggest titrating fluids and using vasopressors to achieve minimal blood pressure targets until hemorrhage is controlled. In case of traumatic brain injury with severe hemorrhage, blood pressure target increases. The scientific literature supporting these recommendations is limited, and several aspects remain the subject of ongoing scientific debate. The aim of this review is to evaluate the existing evidence on low-volume fluid resuscitation during the first hours of trauma management, with an emphasis on its integration with permissive hypotension, vasopressor use and cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. The review also highlights the limitations of current guidelines, particularly the lack of robust evidence supporting specific type of fluid, volumes and administration protocols tailored to specific trauma scenarios and populations. Emerging technologies such as point-of-care diagnostics, integrated monitoring systems, and machine learning hold promise for enhancing clinical decision-making in trauma care. These innovations could play a crucial role, ultimately helping clinicians address critical unanswered questions in trauma management and improve patient survival.

conclusionsCrystalloid-based resuscitation remains relevant in early trauma care, but its application must be reassessed considering recent evidence and evolving practices. Further research is essential to refine fluid resuscitation guidelines, particularly in defining safe fluid volumes and the role of vasopressors. The integration of advanced monitoring technologies may offer new opportunities to optimize trauma care and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Crystalloid SolutionsFluid TherapyResuscitationShock, HemorrhagicWounds and InjuriesBrain Injuries, TraumaticHumansCrystalloid SolutionsAdvanced monitoringCrystalloid fluidsFluid resuscitationPermissive hypotensionTrauma careTrauma-induced hemorrhagic shockVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID39695790
PMCPMC11654417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.