Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695785›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2024

A benchmark for computational analysis of animal behavior, using animal-borne tags.

Benjamin Hoffman, Maddie Cusimano, Vittorio Baglione, Daniela Canestrari, Damien Chevallier, Dominic L DeSantis, Lorène Jeantet, Monique A Ladds, Takuya Maekawa, Vicente Mata-Silva and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Benjamin Hoffman *Earth Species Project, Berkeley, CA, USA. benjamin@earthspecies.org.
Maddie Cusimano *Earth Species Project, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Vittorio BaglioneUniversity de León, León, Spain.
Daniela CanestrariUniversity de León, León, Spain.
Damien ChevallierCNRS Borea, Les Anses d'Arlet, France.
Dominic L DeSantisGeorgia College & State University, Milledgeville, GA, USA.
Lorène JeantetAfrican Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Monique A LaddsDepartment of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.
Takuya MaekawaOsaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Vicente Mata-SilvaUniversity Texas El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA.
Víctor Moreno-GonzálezUniversity de León, León, Spain.
Anthony M PaganoUS Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Eva TrapoteUniversity de León, León, Spain.
Outi VainioUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Antti VehkaojaTampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Ken YodaNagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Katherine ZacarianEarth Species Project, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Ari FriedlaenderUniversity of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.

Funding

Business Finland Grant numbers 1665/31/2016, 1894/31/2016, and 7244/31/2016JSPS KAKENHI P21H05299 and JP21H05294Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad - España CGL2016 - 77636-PNational Science Foundation Graduate Research FellowshipNational Science Foundation OPP GrantsUniversity of Texas at El Paso Dodson Research GrantU.S. Geological Survey Changing Arctic Ecosystems Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal-borne sensors ('bio-loggers') can record a suite of kinematic and environmental data, which are used to elucidate animal ecophysiology and improve conservation efforts. Machine learning techniques are used for interpreting the large amounts of data recorded by bio-loggers, but there exists no common framework for comparing the different machine learning techniques in this domain. This makes it difficult to, for example, identify patterns in what works well for machine learning-based analysis of bio-logger data. It also makes it difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of novel methods developed by the machine learning community.

methodsTo address this, we present the Bio-logger Ethogram Benchmark (BEBE), a collection of datasets with behavioral annotations, as well as a modeling task and evaluation metrics. BEBE is to date the largest, most taxonomically diverse, publicly available benchmark of this type, and includes 1654 h of data collected from 149 individuals across nine taxa. Using BEBE, we compare the performance of deep and classical machine learning methods for identifying animal behaviors based on bio-logger data. As an example usage of BEBE, we test an approach based on self-supervised learning. To apply this approach to animal behavior classification, we adapt a deep neural network pre-trained with 700,000 h of data collected from human wrist-worn accelerometers.

resultsWe find that deep neural networks out-perform the classical machine learning methods we tested across all nine datasets in BEBE. We additionally find that the approach based on self-supervised learning out-performs the alternatives we tested, especially in settings when there is a low amount of training data available.

conclusionsIn light of these results, we are able to make concrete suggestions for designing studies that rely on machine learning to infer behavior from bio-logger data. Therefore, we expect that BEBE will be useful for making similar suggestions in the future, as additional hypotheses about machine learning techniques are tested. Datasets, models, and evaluation code are made publicly available at https://github.com/earthspecies/BEBE , to enable community use of BEBE.

Indexed as

AccelerometersAnimal behaviorBio-loggersMachine learningSelf-supervised LearningTime series

Identifiers

PMID39695785
PMCPMC11654173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.