ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2024
The current state of DNA methylation biomarkers in self-collected liquid biopsies for the early detection of cervical cancer: a literature review.
Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of the diagnostic value of SOX1 methylation in different types of cervical cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Triage Performance of FAM19A4/miR124-2 Methylation: 18-Month Follow-Up Results From a Prospective Observational Study Within the Dutch Primary HPV-Based Cervical Screening Program.International journal of cancer · 2026Observational
- Analysis of DNA methylation markers for diagnosing cervical precancer and cancer: A single-center cross-sectional study.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Observational
- Clinical performance of ASCL1/LHX8 DNA methylation on first-void urine to screen for cervical cancer.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- A novel methylation marker on theFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- DNA Methylation in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer: Triage and Management.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026Review
- Comparative performance of hrHPV testing and PAX1/ZNF671 methylation in triaging women with abnormal cytology: a study of paired urine, vaginal and cervical scrape samples.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Enhancing the sensitivity of non-invasive cervical cancer detection using CpG methylation haplotype profiling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Epigenetic Biomarkers for Cervical Cancer Progression: A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Cervical Cancer in the Era of HPV: Translating Molecular Mechanisms into Preventive Public Health Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Molecular Testing as Triage in Cervical Cancer Screening: Economic Evaluation Using Headroom Analysis.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) is a preventable disease and treatable cancer. Most of the new cases and deaths from CC occur in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) due to cultural and systematic barriers leading to low CC screening uptake. In recent years, self-sampling has been proposed as a method to increase CC screening uptake and is slowly being implemented into screening programmes worldwide. Simultaneously, DNA methylation has been proposed as a novel biomarker that could be used for the triage of self-collected samples that test positive for high-risk types of Human Papillomavirus (HPV). In this paper, we conducted a literature review of studies assessing the efficacy of DNA methylation markers to detect Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) in self-collected cervicovaginal swabs or urine (2019-2024). Our review showed that, of the available data, DNA methylation together with self-sampling could perform as well as cytology in the detection of CIN as well as improve uptake of CC screening and reduce loss to follow up, especially in LMICs. However, more data is still needed to understand which methylation tests are most efficacious. Future studies should assess the full potential of DNA methylation and self-sampling in large, diverse screening cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.