Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695718›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2024

Researchers' perspectives on the integration of molecular and genomic data into malaria elimination programmes in Africa: a qualitative study.

Paulina Tindana, Daniel Enos Sekwo, Leonard Baatiema, Abdoulaye Djimde, Pathogen Genomics Diversity Network, Africa (PDNA)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paulina TindanaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. ptindana@ug.edu.gh.
Daniel Enos SekwoDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Leonard BaatiemaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Abdoulaye DjimdeMalaria Research and Training Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, Bamako, Mali.
Pathogen Genomics Diversity Network, Africa (PDNA)

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-023065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria remains a significant public health concern, despite global efforts to combat the disease with highest burden in Africa. Reports of emerging artemisinin partial- resistance in East Africa emphasize the importance of molecular data to guide policy decisions. Hence the need for researchers to collaborate with National control programmes to conduct genomics surveillance of malaria to inform malaria control and elimination policies. This study explored genomic researchers' views on engaging with national control programmes to aid malaria elimination efforts in Africa.

methodsThis research employed an exploratory qualitative approach to investigate the views and experiences of malaria genomics researchers across 16 member countries of the Pathogen Genomic Diversity Network Africa (PDNA). In-depth interviews were conducted with each PDNA Principal Investigator, which were recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Subsequently, the data were analysed thematically with NVivo 12 qualitative data analysis software.

resultsThe study revealed that majority of malaria genomics researchers focused on understanding the genetic composition and adaptation of the malaria parasite, its vector, and human host. Their investigations delved into areas such as drug and insecticide resistance, parasite evolution, host interactions, human host susceptibility to malaria, diversity of vaccine candidates, and molecular surveillance of malaria. Challenges included limited funding, lack of interest and capacity among National Malaria Control Programmes (NMCP) to use research evidence effectively, and difficulties in communicating data implications to policymakers due to the absence of WHO-certified use cases. Despite these obstacles, researchers expressed a keen interest in forming partnerships with NMCPs to integrate genetic data into malaria control efforts in Africa. They also stressed the importance of enhancing researchers' ability to communicate findings to policymakers and local communities through policy briefs and innovative communication strategies.

conclusionThe study underscores the need to strengthen partnerships between genomic researchers and NMCPs to support malaria elimination in Africa. Furthermore, researchers should create practical frameworks for easy integration into WHO reporting formats to facilitate the use of molecular and genomic data in malaria control programme decision-making.

Indexed as

GenomicsMalariaAfricaDisease EradicationHumansQualitative ResearchResearch PersonnelEvidence translationGenomicsMalaria controlMalaria eliminationMolecular surveillancePolicy decision making

Identifiers

PMID39695718
PMCPMC11658363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.