Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695704›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2024

The influence of urbanization on local ecological knowledge: a systematic review.

Juliana Melo Linhares Rangel, André Luiz Borba do Nascimento, Marcelo Alves Ramos

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Addressing environmental misperceptions for nature recovery.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Reflections on the future of European ethnobiology.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juliana Melo Linhares RangelDepartamento de Biologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação Em Etnobiologia E Conservação da Natureza, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manuel de Medeiros, Recife, PE, 52171-900, Brazil. juliana.melolr@gmail.com.
André Luiz Borba do NascimentoLaboratório de Estudos Ecológicos E Etnobiológicos, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Do Maranhão, Avenida João Alberto, Bacabal, MA, 65700-000, Brazil.
Marcelo Alves RamosLaboratório de Estudos Etnobiológicos, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Pernambuco, Rua Amaro Maltês de Farias, Nazaré da Mata, PE, 55800-000, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanization is a complex and multifaceted process studied across various scientific disciplines. However, in ethnobiology, research on the impacts of urbanization on local ecological knowledge (LEK) often lacks standardization and tends to focus primarily on local scales. This study aims to systematically characterize how researchers address urbanization in ethnobiology and assess its effects on LEK globally. We conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA protocol and selected 66 studies from the Web of Science and Scopus databases for analysis. Our findings reveal that researchers often do not adopt a consistent definition of urbanization, frequently framing their study areas within a simplistic urban-rural dichotomy. Although some studies used urbanization indicators, our qualitative analyses, including a correlation matrix, showed that these indicators were largely independent of each other. Additionally, principal component analysis (PCA) with clustering identified four groupings among the indicators, yet with low correlations between them. A t test analysis of the 66 papers shows that urbanization generally has a negative impact on LEK. Based on these findings, we emphasize the critical need for standardized urbanization indicators in ethnobiological studies and propose a new approach for characterizing urbanization, which will enhance the precision and relevance of future research in this field.

Indexed as

KnowledgeUrbanizationEcologyHumansEthnobiologyLocal ecological knowledgeUrbanicityUrban–rural dichotomy

Identifiers

PMID39695704
PMCPMC11657303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.