Observational studyWorld journal of surgical oncology2024
Patterns of care for vulvar cancer and insights from revised FIGO staging: a retrospective study.
Observational study in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunotherapy and Advanced Vulvar Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival and Safety Outcomes.Cancers · 2025Review
- Multidisciplinary Vulvar Cancer Management: The Dermatologist's Perspective.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and patterns of care among women diagnosed with vulvar malignancy at a tertiary care teaching institute. Additionally, the study aimed to analyse the implications of revised FIGO staging system on stage shift and patient outcomes.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted, wherein hospital records of biopsy-proven cases of vulvar cancers managed over a period of 10 years were comprehensively reviewed. The assignment of FIGO staging was performed utilizing both 2009 and 2021 FIGO staging systems for comparative analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 17. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences assessed using the log-rank test. Additionally, multivariable analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazard model.
resultsA total of 82 cases meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Management patterns varied widely, with the majority undergoing surgery (73.2%), followed by definitive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (10.9%), neoadjuvant radiotherapy and subsequent surgery (4.9%), and palliative care (10.9%). Post-operative radiotherapy was administered in 31.7% of cases. The disease-specific recurrence rate was found to be 32.9%, and the mortality rate was 30.5%. The median Disease-Free Survival (DFS) was 17 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 1-36 months), while the Overall Survival (OS) was 27 months (IQR: 9-52 months). Upon application of the 2021 staging system, a stage shift was observed in 18% of cases of advanced vulvar cancer. The 3-year DFS and OS were reduced for stage IIIA and stage IVA, while showing improvement for stage IIIB.
conclusionsThe revised FIGO 2021 staging system offers enhanced simplicity in its application within clinical practice and demonstrates improved correlation with prognosis. Approximately 18% cases experienced restaging under the updated system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.