Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695680›Full record

SynthesisMalaria journal2024

Systematic review of evidence for the impact and effectiveness of the 1-3-7 strategy for malaria elimination.

Nihal Sogandji, Anna Stevenson, Michael Y Luo, Gao Qi, Richard J Maude

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nihal Sogandji *School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Rd, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK.
Anna Stevenson *School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Rd, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK.
Michael Y LuoSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Rd, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK.
Gao QiJiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Meiyuan Yangxiang 117, Wuxi, China.
Richard J MaudeMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. richard@tropmedres.ac.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1193472_2018Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 220211/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 1-3-7 approach to eliminate malaria was first implemented in China in 2012. It has since been expanded to multiple countries, but no systematic review has examined the evidence for its use. A systematic review was conducted aiming to evaluate the impact and effectiveness of the strategy and identify key challenges and variations in its implementation across different countries.

methodsPUBMED, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CABS Abstracts, LILACS, Global Health, Medrxiv, Biorxiv were searched for all studies containing 1-3-7 and articles included if they contained information on 1-3-7 impact, effectiveness, challenges and/or adaptations for implementation in different countries.

results31 studies were included from China (19), Thailand (6), Myanmar (2), Tanzania (1), Cambodia (1), India (1) and Vietnam (1). During 1-3-7 implementation, malaria cases in China decreased by 99.1-99.9%, in Thailand by 66.9% during 2013-19, 65,1% in Cambodia during 2015-17 and 30.3% in India during 2015-16, with some differences in implementation. It was not possible to separate the impact of 1-3-7 from that due to other contemporaneous interventions. Implementing the 1-3-7 policy was largely effective, with reporting within 1 day in 99.8-100% of individuals in China and 36-100% in other countries, investigation within 3 days in 81.5-99.4% in China and 79.4-100% in other countries, and foci investigation within 7 days in 90.1-100% in China and 83.2-100% in other countries. Adaptations to 1-3-7 were described in 5 studies, mostly adjustment of the timing and/or definitions of each component. Key challenges identified included those related to staffing, equipment, process, and patient-provided information.

conclusionOverall, the 1-3-7 approach was effectively implemented with a concomitant decrease in cases in malaria elimination settings, however, it was not possible to quantify impact as it was not implemented in isolation. Implementing adequate measures for testing, reporting, treatment, and containment is crucial for its success, which is dependent on the availability of resources, infrastructure, staffing, and consistent compliance across regions and throughout the year. However, achieving this nationally and maintaining compliance, especially at borders with malaria-affected countries, poses significant challenges.

Indexed as

Disease EradicationMalariaHumans1-3-7 strategyEliminationMalariaReactive case detection

Identifiers

PMID39695680
PMCPMC11657205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.