ArticleNutrition & metabolism2024
An interpretable machine learning model for precise prediction of biomarkers for intermittent fasting pattern.
Article in Nutrition & metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Precision Nutrition: A Paradigm Evolution in Dietary Assessment and Intervention.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intermittent fasting is currently a highly sought-after dietary pattern. To explore the potential biomarkers of intermittent fasting, untargeted metabolomics analysis of fecal metabolites in two groups of mice, intermittent fasting and normal feeding, was conducted using UPLC-HRMS. The data was further analyzed through interpretable machine learning (ML) to data mine the biomarkers for two dietary patterns. We developed five machine learning models and results showed that under three-fold cross-validation, Random Forest model was the most suitable for distinguishing the two dietary patterns. Finally, Shapely Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were explored to perform a weighted explanatory analysis on the Random Forest model, and the contribution of each metabolite to the model was calculated. Results indicated that Ganoderenic Acid C is the potential biomarkers to distinguish the two dietary patterns. Our work provides new insights for metabolic biomarker analysis and lays a theoretical foundation for the selection of a healthieir dietary lifestyle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.