ArticleBMC medical education2024
Validation of a didactic model evaluating the usability, usefulness and acceptability of psychological first aid teaching through simulation.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of simulation as a means to teach Psychological First Aid in Operations (PFA-O). We propose to use a model built on research in didactics to assess the factors which may or may not encourage trainers to adopt and embrace this teaching technique. MATERIAL AND
methodWe submitted a questionnaire to all PFA-O trainers working in France, comprising 15 criteria divided into three dimensions: usability, usefulness and acceptability. Correlation and regression analyses were applied to assess the links between these criteria, teacher motivation, and actual implementation of training courses. We also wanted to test the relevance of these criteria to predict motivation in a multiple linear regression model.
results59 trainers, i.e. 52.68% of the national workforce, responded to the questionnaire. Correlation analysis showed good model consistency, with significant correlations between the 3 dimensions under evaluation (usability, usefulness and acceptability), between these dimensions and teacher motivation, and a strong correlation between teacher motivation and the number of introductory training sessions undertaken each year. The final model incorporating the 15 criteria showed an R
conclusionThis didactic model is relevant to assessing the motivational factors which contribute to trainers' adherence to medical simulation and provides a methodological basis to evaluate the ergonomics of an educational tool in the field of health care. These findings suggest its applicability to a wider range of educational contexts beyond the military.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.