ArticleBMC health services research2024
Evaluating maternal death surveillance and response system in Sunyani Municipality of Bono region in Ghana from 2017-2021.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMaternal death rates in Ghana have decreased overall but remain high in rural areas. The Maternal Death Surveillance and Response System (MDSR) aims to eliminate preventable maternal deaths effectively. However, its effectiveness is less pronounced at district and subdistrict levels than at national and regional levels. Despite the requirement for periodic evaluation, there is a lack of evidence supporting these assessments. This study focuses on evaluating the MDSR in Sunyani Municipal.
methodsThe evaluation was conducted using a cross-sectional design, using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Data from the District Health Information Management Systems (DHIMS) and the maternal death line list from January 2017 to December 2021 on maternal deaths were reviewed. Stakeholders, including health professionals, were interviewed. The means, proportions, and other statistical measures were calculated using Epi Info Version 7. Qualitative data underwent content analysis, and the results were visually presented in tables and flowcharts to illustrate the flow of surveillance information.
resultsMost respondents were female, constituting 51.4% (19/37), with midwives comprising the largest group at 32.4% (12/37). Approximately 75.7% (28/37) were able to explain how the surveillance data has been used for public health action. The notification and reporting process was clear to 85% (17/20) of respondents. Although 94.6% (35/37) expressed willingness to notify and participate in audits at facility and community levels, the audits remained facility-based. All facilities consistently reported maternal deaths, but data storage equipment was lacking. Approximately 80% (20/25) of forms were reported within 24 h, and 88% (22/25) were investigated within seven days. Only 68% (17/25) of forms were filled out correctly, with no municipal and facility-level line list. All reported deaths came from healthcare facilities, with no community-reported maternal deaths.
conclusionsThe MDSR system in Sunyani Municipal demonstrates high awareness and willingness to participate among healthcare providers but faces challenges in data accuracy and community engagement. Death audits remain facility-based, and the lack of community-reported maternal deaths and municipal-level line lists indicates gaps in comprehensive reporting and data management. To improve the system, it is recommended that community case searches be enhanced for better reporting and to address data management issues by ensuring proper data quality assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.