ArticleBMC nursing2024
Development and psychometric testing of the modeling scale for novice nurses: a cross-sectional survey design.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of modeling behavior by novice nurses on workplace adaptation: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundModeling is the learning of new patterns of behavior by observers through observation. In order for novice nurses to learn effectively in a busy, multi-tasking clinical environment, they need a learning strategy that is integrated into their daily work. Modeling is a necessary learning strategy for nurses because they learn skills, knowledge, and attitudes by observing senior nurses in action. In nursing, it is important to learn skills, knowledge, and attitudes by observing the behavior of senior colleagues. However, previous studies have shown that there are situations in which modeling is not done smoothly. Therefore, in this study, we decided to develop a modeling self-assessment scale to assist novice nurses in modeling.
methods1,457 novice nurses from a random sample of 103 hospitals in Japan were selected, of which 337 novice nurses were surveyed from November 2019 to January 2020 by anonymous questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of the draft Modeling Scale for Novice Nurses, The Scale Measuring a Sense of Generalized Self-Efficacy and a simplified version of the Scale of Self-Regulated Learning Strategy for Nurses for review of criteria-related relevance to the Modeling Scale for Novice Nurses, and personal background. Factor analysis was used for analysis, and correlation coefficients were calculated for criterion-related validity. For stability, the number of intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for consenting subjects by retesting method 3 weeks after their responses.
resultsThe demographics of the participants were 316 women and 21 men, with a mean age of 22.7 ± 1.8 years. Item and factor analyses yielded 21 items with four subscales. Cronbach's α coefficient for the 21 items was 0.930. The correlation coefficients for the Modeling Scale for Novice Nurses and the Scale of Self-Regulated Learning Strategy for Nurses ranged from 0.266 to 0.480. In the retest method, the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.771 to 0.786.
conclusionsThe Modeling Scale for Novice Nurses can be used to obtain novice nurses' self-assessment of modeling and to assist novice nurses in modeling smoothly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.