Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695627›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Ultrasound education, competencies and expected future use among medical interns in Denmark: a national cross-sectional study.

Pernille Gram, Thomas Purup, Emilie Marie Eriksen, Stina Søbye, Simone Kjaergaard Wielandt, Kasper Astorp, Martin Bach Jensen, Camilla Aakjaer Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pernille GramCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9260, Denmark. pernillegj@dcm.aau.dk.
Thomas PurupCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9260, Denmark.
Emilie Marie EriksenCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9260, Denmark.
Stina SøbyeInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9260, Denmark.
Simone Kjaergaard WielandtInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9260, Denmark.
Kasper AstorpInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9260, Denmark.
Martin Bach JensenCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9260, Denmark.
Camilla Aakjaer AndersenCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Selma Lagerløfs Vej 249, Gistrup, 9260, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound is increasingly used across medical specialties, calling for timely and relevant ultrasound education in specialty training. To enable customizing such education, we aimed to explore medical interns' received ultrasound education during medical school and internship, perceived scanning competencies, evaluation of received education, future expectations for using ultrasound, and tendencies for perceiving ultrasound competence.

methodsThis was a national cross-sectional study. We developed a questionnaire based on a theoretical conceptual model, individual interviews with medical interns and focus groups with medical students, followed by pilot testing. The questionnaire was distributed to all medical interns in Denmark (N = 1231). Data were summarized with descriptive statistics. Differences between universities and tendencies for perceiving ultrasound competence were analyzed with Fisher's exact tests and modified Poisson regression, respectively.

resultsResponses from 420 (34.1%) interns were included. Although varying across medical schools, 95.7% received formal ultrasound training and 86.0% encountered ultrasound examinations through clinical rotation. During internship, 44.2% received formal training, while 68.5% had to pursue it independently. Ultrasound examinations during clinical work were observed by 73.2% and performed by 47.6%. Common ultrasound usage barriers were insufficient scanning routine, supervision, knowledge, confidence and mental surplus. Ultrasound competence gain from medical school and internship was reported by 75.2% and 55.3%, respectively, but mainly to lesser/some extent. Most desired more training, expected to use ultrasound in the future (71.0%) and considered it a core competence (73.0%). Perceived ultrasound competence was significantly associated with receiving practical (RR: 4.08) or both practical and theoretical education (RR: 4.34) in medical school, and practical training on patients (RR: 1.09), required number of performed scans (RR: 1.06), competence test(s) (RR: 1.07), and/or consulting books/encyclopedia (RR:1.07) during internship.

conclusionsUltrasound training is part of medical school curricula but varies in type and extent. While most encounter and many use ultrasound during internships, formal training is less integrated. Most desire more training and attitudes towards future ultrasound usage are positive. Filled curricula pose dilemmas for prioritization and several barriers prevail for using ultrasound, representing missed opportunities for competence development and maintenance. Training governance and scaffolding continuous learning may be needed.

trial registrationNone.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyUltrasonographyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumDenmarkFemaleHumansMalePoint-of-Care SystemsSurveys and QuestionnairesMedical educationMedical internshipPoint-of-care ultrasoundScanning competenceSurveyUltrasonographyUltrasound education

Identifiers

PMID39695627
PMCPMC11656876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.