ArticleBMC nursing2024
The interactivity and independence of Recovery challenges and coping strategies for ICU survivors and their caregivers: a systematic review and Meta-synthesis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rehabilitation and the post-intensive care syndrome across the recovery continuum: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Patient-reported outcomes and experience measures in clinical trials of critically ill adults with sepsis: a scoping review.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the acceptability of remote multicomponent rehabilitation versus standard care following critical illness: a theory-informed qualitative study embedded within the iRehab trial.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Traumatic memories and nursing experiences of ICU discharged patients: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Development and initial psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire for post intensive care recovery - PIR.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe post-ICU home recovery period requires patients and caregivers to confront recovery challenges and adopt coping strategies as a family dyad, necessitating effective dyadic interaction patterns. Existing qualitative research shows that the dyads face interactive or independent challenges and employs varying coping strategies, which may include strong communication or, conversely, avoidance. However, a single qualitative study alone might offer limited generalizability, and there is a lack of broader, more nuanced understanding about the recovery challenge and copings among ICU survivors and caregivers. This meta-synthesis aims to figure out the interactivity and independence of challenges and coping strategies during the recovery process for ICU survivors and caregivers.
methodsThis is a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, which was guided by the Stress and Coping Framework. We systematically reviewed six electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycArticles, and PsycInfo, for relevant qualitative studies published from inception to January, 2024. We utilized a content analysis approach for data analysis. Presentation of this synthesis adhered to the PRISMA guideline and the ENTREQ guideline.
resultsAfter full-text screening, 49 studies were included. Four themes with 16 sub-themes emerged from this synthesis including, interactivity of recovery challenges for ICU survivors and caregivers (subthemes: Life was turned upside down, Situational overstrain, Isolation without compassion, Empowerment conflicts, Marginalized support), independence of recovery challenges for ICU survivors and caregivers (subthemes: Recovery means silent suffering, Gap in memory, Sacrificing to caregiving), interactivity of recovery coping strategies for ICU survivors and caregivers (subthemes: Reorientation of mindset, Cultivating inner power, Sharing burden with an open-ear, Going through thick and thin together, Negotiating care level), and independence of recovery coping strategies for ICU survivors and caregivers (subthemes: Wearing a faked smile, Developing daily routine, Seeking respite).
conclusionsThe findings suggest that ICU survivors and caregivers experience overlapping yet distinct challenges during recovery, often involving shared coping strategies, alongside a need for individual space. These results support the presence of both interactivity and independence in recovery challenges and coping strategies for ICU survivors and their caregivers. Therefore, we call for future dyadic or family interventions to target both ICU survivors and caregivers, taking advantage of their interactivity and desire for gradual independence, so that fostered individualized coping strategies adapted to flexible contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.