ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Predicting blood transfusion demand in intensive care patients after surgery by comparative analysis of temporally extended data selection.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Intraoperative Blood Transfusion in Partial Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting blood transfusion after ICU admission in five databases: A comparison of three machine learning paradigms.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood transfusion (BT) is a critical aspect of medical care for surgical patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Timely and accurate identification of BT needs can enhance patient outcomes and healthcare resource management.
methodsThis study aims to determine whether a machine learning (ML) model can be trained to predict the need for blood transfusion (BT) in patients on the ICU after a wide range of surgeries, utilizing only data from the ICU.
resultsThis retrospective study analyzed data from 9,118 surgical ICU patients from the Amsterdam University Medical Centers database (UMCdb). The study included a primary analysis using data from 6 h before ICU admission up to 1, 2, 3, and 6 h after admission, and a secondary analysis using only the data from 6 h before ICU admission and only the data from the first hour after admission. The model integrated 32 relevant clinical variables and compared the performance of XGBoost and logistic regression (LR) algorithms.
conclusionsThe model demonstrated an effective BT prediction, with XGBoost outperforming LR, particularly for a 12-hour prediction window. Notable differences in patient characteristics were observed among those who received BT and those who did not receive BT. The study establishes the feasibility of using ML for the prediction of BT in surgical ICU patients. It underlines the potential of ML models as decision support tools in healthcare, enabling early identification of BT needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.