ArticleMicrobial cell factories2024
Inactivation of the conserved protease LonA increases production of xylanase and amylase in Bacillus subtilis.
Article in Microbial cell factories, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive responses of genome-reduced Bacillus subtilis during enzyme secretion in a breathing vessel culture.Microbial cell factories · 2026Article
- Impact of expression systems on the transcriptome ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBacillus subtilis is widely used for industrial enzyme production due to its capacity to efficiently secrete proteins. However, secretion efficiency of enzymes varies widely, and optimizing secretion is crucial to make production commercially viable. Previously, we have shown that overexpression of the xylanase XynA lowers expression of Clp protein chaperones, and that inactivation of CtsR, which regulates and represses clp transcription, increases the production of XynA. In the current study, we examined whether the same is the case for overexpression of the α-amylase AmyM from Geobacillus stearothermophilus by B. subtilis, and why XynA shows a different timing of secretion compared to AmyM.
resultsTranscriptome analyses revealed that B. subtilis cells overexpressing AmyM exhibited a distinct profile compared to XynA overexpressing cells, however there were also similarities and in both cases expression of CtsR controlled genes was downregulated. In contrast to XynA, inactivation of CtsR did not improve AmyM production. Upregulation of other protein chaperones, including GroEL/ES and DnaJ/K, by inactivating their transcriptional repressor HrcA, had almost no effect on XynA yields and in fact considerably lowered that of AmyM. Despite using the same promoter, the production of XynA peaks well before AmyM reaches its optimal secretion rate. Transcriptome and ribosome profiling indicated that this is neither related to transcription nor to translation regulation. We show that the reduced secretion in the stationary phase is partially due to the activity of secreted proteases, but also due to the activity of the intracellular protease LonA. The absence of this protein resulted in a 140% and 20% increased production for XynA and AmyM, respectively.
conclusionThe combination of transcriptome and ribosome profiling offered important information to determine at which cellular level production bottlenecks occurred. This helped us to identify LonA protease as an important factor influencing enzyme production yields in B. subtilis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.