Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695607›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Attitudes toward the adoption of eHealth amongst healthcare professionals in trauma surgery - the new digital normal?

Jelle Friso Spierings, Gijs Johan Antoon Willinge, Bas Anne Twigt, Sjoerd Repping, Marike Cornelia Kokke, Ruben van Veen, Detlef van der Velde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jelle Friso SpieringsDepartment of Trauma surgery, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Utrecht, Soestwetering 1, Utrecht, 3543 AZ, The Netherlands. jfspierings@outlook.com.
Gijs Johan Antoon WillingeDepartment of Trauma Surgery, OLVG, Jan Tooropstraat 164, Amsterdam, 1061 AE, The Netherlands.
Bas Anne TwigtDepartment of Trauma Surgery, OLVG, Jan Tooropstraat 164, Amsterdam, 1061 AE, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd ReppingAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, the Netherlands.
Marike Cornelia KokkeDepartment of Trauma surgery, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Utrecht, Soestwetering 1, Utrecht, 3543 AZ, The Netherlands.
Ruben van VeenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, OLVG, Jan Tooropstraat 164, Amsterdam, 1061 AE, The Netherlands.
Detlef van der VeldeDepartment of Trauma surgery, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Utrecht, Soestwetering 1, Utrecht, 3543 AZ, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs in many other countries, the Dutch emergency healthcare system is under pressure due to increasing numbers of patients, limited budgets, and constrained (human) resources (TraumaNet AMC 19 May, 2016; Int J Emerg Med 6:41, 2013). eHealth, enlarged by the COVID-19 pandemic, has been advocated to substitute face-to-face care to alleviate the pressure of the burden of care (Ministry of Health Welfare and Sport, 2022; Dutch Society of Hospitals, 2022). In order for eHealth solutions to be adopted in daily practice, is it essential to assess healthcare professionals' attitudes toward its usefulness. As this is currently lacking, this study explores the use of eHealth in daily practice, opportunities of eHealth, implementation barriers, and desired functions and features amongst healthcare professionals working in Dutch orthopedic surgery and traumatology.

methodsA cross-sectional, web-based survey among the 605 members of the Dutch Society of Trauma Surgery and related healthcare professionals on the attitudes towards eHealth in daily practice was performed between November 4, 2021, and March 31, 2022. The survey consisted of five sections with 42 questions, including close-ended questions, multiple-choice questions, 5-point Likert Scales, Visual Analogue Scales, and free-text questions.

resultsOf the 111 responding healthcare professionals, 59/111 (53%) were male, and the median age was 40 years (IQR 26 to 67). Almost all participants owned smartphones (109/111, 98.2%). Most participants reported that the COVID-19 pandemic had influenced their attitude towards the usefulness of eHealth positively (80/111, 72%). Most participants (59%) would use a digital alternative instead of face-to-face follow-up if proven a safe technology, and expect that 64% of all patients would prefer a digital option. Most healthcare professionals stated that eHealth could reduce healthcare costs (94/111, 85%) and improve patient satisfaction (81/111, 73%) but is hindered most by a lack of financial support during implementation (57/111, 51%), followed by complex laws and regulations (54/111, 49%). DISCUSSION: Results of this cross-sectional survey show that attitudes of orthopedic surgery or traumatology-related healthcare professionals toward the usefulness of eHealth are positive and may have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Even though healthcare professionals believe eHealth could reduce costs and improve patient satisfaction, daily clinical use remains low possibly due to a lack of long-term and short-term financial support and complex laws and regulations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19TelemedicineAcute Care SurgeryAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTraumatologyAdoptionCOVID-19eHealthOrthopaedic surgeryTrauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID39695607
PMCPMC11654188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.