ArticleBMC health services research2024
Utility of colposcopy for the screening and management of cervical cancer in Africa: a cross-sectional analysis of providers' training and practices.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating pocket colposcope and telecolposcopy into VIA-based screening at primary healthcare centers for cervical cancer prevention in LMICs.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Visual diagnostics for female genital schistosomiasis and the opportunity for improvement using computer vision.Parasitology · 2025Review
- Accelerating the elimination of global cervical cancer through intelligent training for colposcopy.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCervical cancer is a public health issue in Africa with devastating socioeconomic consequences due to the lack of organized screening programs. The success of screening programs depends on the appropriate investigation and management of women who test positive for screening. Colposcopic assessment following positive screening results is a noteworthy issue in Africa. This study aimed to assess the utilization of colposcopy by providers in the region.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021-2022 among healthcare providers involved in cervical cancer prevention activities in Africa. They were invited to report prior colposcopy training, whether they performed colposcopy and the indications of colposcopy in their practice.
resultsOf the 130 providers from 23 African countries who responded to the survey (mean age [SD]: 39.0 years [9.4]), half were female (65 [50.0%]), and 90.7% reported working in urban areas. Overall, only 12.6% of respondents indicated having received prior training on colposcopy, and 11.7% reported that they were performing colposcopy in their current practice. Among the providers who reported performing colposcopy in their practice, colposcopy was indicated for routine cervical cancer screening in 21.2% of clinicians, to better visualize the transformation zone in 15.2% of respondents, to further assess the vascularization of cervical mucosa in 33.3% of respondents, and to determine the appropriate treatment modality in 12.1% of respondents. Providers who performed colposcopy in their practice reported a median number of 30 (interquartile range: 19-65) colposcopic procedures in the past 6 months.
conclusionProviders' training and practice of colposcopy for cervical cancer screening remain suboptimal in Africa. To increase utilization of colposcopy in the region, further training is needed to improve providers' knowledge and engagement. With the development of lower-cost and portable colposcopes, efforts to equip cervical cancer prevention programs and facilities with colposcopy should be enhanced to ensure that women can be screened and managed appropriately in the clinical setting and communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.