ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2024
BABINE: An original and user-friendly scale for the simple and quick management of herb-drug interactions in clinical practice.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile more and more people tend to use herbal products thinking they are safer than conventional western medicine, the reality is other. If natural products are bio-active and possess potential therapeutic activities, then the benefit/risk balance should be considered like any other health product. Some herbs are known to have the potential to interact with patient's treatment and to cause adverse drug reactions. While these are scarce, they are potentially harmful, and can lead to major sequels and even death in some cases. Despite these known facts, little guidelines about how to evaluate the risk of interaction and to handle them exist in literature. Notably, few scales allowing to assess the risk of a specific combination of herbs and drugs exist.
methodWe propose a new scoring method BABINE (Boosting Analysis of Bibliography for herb- drug INteraction Evaluation) and discuss a scale to evaluate this risk based on iterative rounds of experts' discussion.
resultsAfter 6 rounds of case reports/clinical studies evaluation, we analyzed and synthesized criteria identified as important by the experts and developed a corresponding evaluation scale.
conclusionEven if our scale greatly simplifies pharmacological events, we believe it provides a robust and transparent way to rapidly assess the risk of adverse event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.