Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39695588›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Developing institution-specific admission competency criteria for prospective health sciences students.

Eunhee Kang, Ryan Jin Young Kim, Young-Seok Park, Shin-Young Park, Jihyun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eunhee Kang *Center for Future Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1128-0186
Ryan Jin Young Kim *Department of Dental Education, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7132-8180
Young-Seok ParkDepartment of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0148-7848
Shin-Young Park *Department of Dental Education, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. nalby99@snu.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3136-5956
Jihyun Lee *Department of Dental Education, School of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. leeji1@snu.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9357-5345

Funding

the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) 2021R1F1A1056465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the critical role of health professionals in societal health, the development of robust and effective selection methods is of fundamental concern for educational institutions within the field of health sciences education. Conventionally, admission competencies have been determined by institutional authorities. Developing institution-specific competency criteria enables an admission process that is mission- and value-aware, evidence-based, and strategically adaptable. However, few schools have established their admission competency criteria, although the majority possess their own models of graduation competencies. This study reports the process of developing and validating an institution-specific admission competency model that addresses the need for evidence-based and mission-aligned selection processes that are distinct from standardized models.

methodsThis study was conducted in two phases, using both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Phase I involved constructing an admission competency model through a qualitative approach facilitated by workshops with 17 faculty members and 92 first-year pre-doctoral students of a dental school. Through constant comparative analysis, this phase focused on the extraction and refinement of competencies for entering dental students. In Phase II, a questionnaire developed from the workshops asked respondents to rate the importance of 47 attributes across 10 constructs on a 5-point Likert scale. A total of 301 individuals participated in the survey. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) identified the factor structure, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) examined construct validity and assessed the model fit with the data.

resultsThe EFA of the 47 attributes identified 10 factors, and the CFA results indicated a good-to-acceptable level of fit for the ten-factor model. Aligned with the American Association of Medical Colleges Premed competencies, this study identified unique attributes specific to the institution, such as confidence, leadership, and entrepreneurship. These findings highlight the importance of developing tailored competencies reflecting the unique needs of institutions and their fields.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility and value of creating institution-specific admission competency models, offering a methodology that aligns with evidence-based mission-driven selection processes. The distinct competencies identified emphasize the need for educational institutions to consider unique institutional and field-specific requirements and move beyond standardized models to enhance the selection of medical students.

Indexed as

School Admission CriteriaAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAdmission competencyEvidence-based mission-driven selection processesHealthcare professionalHealth sciences education

Identifiers

PMID39695588
PMCPMC11654345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.