ArticleBMC nursing2024
Searching for private patient information in Internet resources (patient-targeted Google)-experiences of nurses and nursing students.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Internet is a source of many information about users who are unaware of the extent to which their privacy and anonymity are abolished. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of patient-targeted Google and to know about selected factors influencing such searches among nurses and midwives, as well as nursing and midwifery students.
methodsThe study was conducted using a diagnostic survey method and the research tool was an author's survey questionnaire that included a sociodemographic section, questions on patient-targeted Google, and a description of three cases written for the study representing the behavior of members of the therapeutic team in specific situations related to the provision of health services asking respondents to evaluate the actions taken.
resultsThe majority of respondents (59.82%) looked for information about patients on the Internet. The main (79.34%) reason for starting the search was curiosity and the desire to understand the patient's behavior (50.18%). According to 54.06%, obtaining information about patients without informing them is unethical and may violate the principle of informed consent (56.07%) and privacy (55.19%).
conclusionsThe phenomenon of searching for private information about patients on the Internet is present among polish nurses and midwives as well as students of nursing and midwifery. Due to the potential benefits and risks associated with conducting patient targeted googling there is a need for education about patient-targeted Google in the scope of basic education of students, but also postgraduate education of nurses and midwives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.