ArticleBMC medical education2024
Engagement of general practice preceptors in teaching residents in outpatient settings in China: a national cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOutpatient training is crucial for the standardized residency training of General Practitioners (GPs) in China. However, there is concern that General Practice (GP) preceptors may lack the willingness and capacities to teach residents in outpatient settings. Understanding how GP preceptors practice routine outpatient training and their views is essential for designing strategies; however, this issue has not been well studied. Thus, our study aimed to investigate the extent of GP preceptors' engagement in teaching residents in outpatient settings and to identify the factors associated with their practice of providing guidance in China.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we distributed a self-administered questionnaire to 417 GP preceptors. Participants were selected from 142 hospitals across 24 provinces and had participated in the National GP Preceptor Training Program in early May 2024 in Hangzhou, China. A descriptive analysis was used to assess the extent of GP preceptors teaching residents in outpatient settings and their perceptions of outpatient training. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the associated factors of GP preceptors' engagement in teaching residents in outpatient settings.
resultsOf the 297 participants included in the final analysis, 64.3% were female, with a mean age of 41.8 years (range: 29-56). A majority (63%) of GP preceptors expressed confidence in their ability to conduct outpatient training, and 68.7% indicated a willingness to increase their teaching efforts. While over 70% reported "always" or "often" providing helpful guidance to residents, only about a third consistently encouraged residents to take medical histories, perform physical examinations, and make preliminary clinical decisions. Logistic regression analysis shows that GP preceptors' frequent outpatient training, more medical experience, longer preceptorship, and confidence and determination were positively correlated with offering helpful guidance to residents, whereas concerns about reduced consultation efficiency and income were negatively associated with this guidance.
conclusionAlthough most GP preceptors in China report a strong willingness to engage in outpatient training, their actual teaching practice falls short of expectations in some respects and is correlated with their prior experiences and perceptions of such training. Strategic interventions that offer incentives, support, and increased opportunities for engagement in outpatient training are essential to enhance teaching practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.